Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68, GPT-5.6 Sol 66, Claude Fable 5 65). The right pick depends on what you value most.
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
65/100- ECI162.2
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1M
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
68/100- ECI154.8
- Price$2.00 / $12.00
- Context1.05M
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol
66/100- ECI161.8
- Price$4.00 / $20.00
- Context1.05M
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68/100, GPT-5.6 Sol 66/100, Claude Fable 5 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Fable 5 for raw capability and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityClaude Fable 5Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Fable 5 162.2 · GPT-5.6 Sol 161.8 · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8
- Lowest priceGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview $4.50 · GPT-5.6 Sol $8.00 · Claude Fable 5 $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.6 Sol 1,050,000 · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · Claude Fable 5 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewClaude Fable 5: Text, Images, PDFs · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · GPT-5.6 Sol: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 94 | 84 | 93 |
| Price | 25% | 0 | 19 | 7 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 100 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 68/100 | 66/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Fable 5Anthropic | Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle | GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 162.2 (best) | 154.8 | 161.8 |
| ECI rank | #7 of 148 (best) | #31 of 148 | #8 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 85.9% | 94.4% (best) | 93.5% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 87.0% | 59.7% | 89.1% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 100% (best) | 95.6% | 100% (best) |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 75.6% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 70.7% | 73.5% (best) | 69.7% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $10.00 | $2.00 (best) | $4.00 |
| Output | $50.00 | $12.00 (best) | $20.00 |
| Cached input | $1.00 | $0.20 (best) | $0.40 |
| Blended (3:1) | $20.00 | $4.50 (best) | $8.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 200K: $4.00 / $18.00 | Over 272K: $8.00 / $30.00 |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Official Google API | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | claude-fable-5 | gemini-3.1-pro-preview | gpt-5.6-sol |
| API providers | 38 | 26 | 40 (best) |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 | Jul 9, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 2025 | Feb 16, 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Fable 5$200.00
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$44.00
- GPT-5.6 Sol$80.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.6 Sol?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68/100, GPT-5.6 Sol 66/100, Claude Fable 5 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Fable 5 for raw capability and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). GPT-5.6 Sol costs $4.00 input / $20.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.50 per million tokens for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview versus $8.00 for GPT-5.6 Sol (1.8× as much) and $20.00 for Claude Fable 5 (4.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Claude Fable 5 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Fable 5 162.2 (#7 of 148), GPT-5.6 Sol 161.8 (#8 of 148) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8 (#31 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (159.6–166.1 vs 159.3–165.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 94.4%, GPT-5.6 Sol 93.5%, Claude Fable 5 85.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-5.6 Sol 89.1%, Claude Fable 5 87.0%, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 59.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Claude Fable 5 100%, GPT-5.6 Sol 100%, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 95.6%; SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 73.5%, Claude Fable 5 70.7%, GPT-5.6 Sol 69.7%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Fable 5 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview have the largest context windows (1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5. Maximum output per response: Claude Fable 5 up to 128,000, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview up to 65,536, GPT-5.6 Sol up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Fable 5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; GPT-5.6 Sol accepts text, images and PDFs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-5.6 Sol are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
GPT-5.6 Sol is the newest, released Jul 9, 2026. Claude Fable 5 came out Jun 9, 2026; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview came out Feb 19, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Fable 5 Jan 31, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Jan 2025, GPT-5.6 Sol Feb 16, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3Moonshot AI · ECI 157.6
- Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 156.6
- Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.6xAI · ECI 156.6
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.3 CodexOpenAI · ECI 156.8
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 153.7
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · ECI 152.3
