ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 comes out ahead, 73 to 68 and 66 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Anthropic

    Claude Fable 5.1

    Released Sep 1, 2026

    66/100
    • ECI164.8
    • Price$10.00 / $50.00
    • Context1M
  2. OpenAI

    GPT-6 Astra

    Released Sep 4, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI166.5
    • Price$10.00 / $50.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Our pick

    Meta

    Muse Spark 1.3

    Released Sep 2, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI156.9
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Muse Spark 1.3 is our pick

Muse Spark 1.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against GPT-6 Astra (68) and Claude Fable 5.1 (66). It leads on price and inputs & features. GPT-6 Astra wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-6 AstraCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6 Astra 166.5 · Claude Fable 5.1 164.8 · Muse Spark 1.3 156.9
  • Lowest priceMuse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.3 $2.00 · Claude Fable 5.1 $20.00 · GPT-6 Astra $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-6 Astra and Muse Spark 1.3GPT-6 Astra 1,050,000 · Muse Spark 1.3 1,048,576 · Claude Fable 5.1 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsMuse Spark 1.3Claude Fable 5.1: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-6 Astra: Text, Images, PDFs · Muse Spark 1.3: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6 AstraMuse Spark 1.3
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%979987
Price25%0036
Inputs & features15%8080100
Context window10%606161
Overall100%66/10068/10073/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Spark 1.3 specifications side by side
SpecificationClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicGPT-6 AstraOpenAIMuse Spark 1.3Meta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)164.8166.5 (best)156.9
ECI rank#4 of 148#2 of 148 (best)#17 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—95.8%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics90.2%93.7% (best)74.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics100% (best)100% (best)99.2%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions70.8%75.6% (best)—
Price per million tokens
Input$10.00$10.00$1.25 (best)
Output$50.00$50.00$4.25 (best)
Cached input$0.25$1.00$0.15 (best)
Blended (3:1)$20.00$20.00$2.00 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 272K: $20.00 / $75.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Anthropic APIOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Meta API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesYesYes
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDclaude-fable-5-1gpt-6-astramuse-spark-1.3
API providers29 (best)2612
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Sep 4, 2026Sep 2, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJun 2026Apr 30, 2026—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Claude Fable 5.1$200.00
  • GPT-6 Astra$200.00
  • Muse Spark 1.3$21.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against GPT-6 Astra (68) and Claude Fable 5.1 (66). It leads on price and inputs & features. GPT-6 Astra wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price); GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for Muse Spark 1.3 versus $20.00 for Claude Fable 5.1 (10× as much) and $20.00 for GPT-6 Astra (10× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-6 Astra 166.5 (#2 of 148), Claude Fable 5.1 164.8 (#4 of 148) and Muse Spark 1.3 156.9 (#17 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (163.1–171.1 vs 161.8–169.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-6 Astra 93.7%, Claude Fable 5.1 90.2%, Muse Spark 1.3 74.4%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Claude Fable 5.1 100%, GPT-6 Astra 100%, Muse Spark 1.3 99.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra and Muse Spark 1.3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6 Astra leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Astra and Muse Spark 1.3 have the largest context windows (1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5.1. Maximum output per response: Claude Fable 5.1 up to 128,000, GPT-6 Astra up to 128,000, Muse Spark 1.3 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Claude Fable 5.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-6 Astra accepts text, images and PDFs; Muse Spark 1.3 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Muse Spark 1.3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra and Muse Spark 1.3 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

GPT-6 Astra is the newest, released Sep 4, 2026. Muse Spark 1.3 came out Sep 2, 2026; Claude Fable 5.1 came out Sep 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Fable 5.1 Jun 2026, GPT-6 Astra Apr 30, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.