ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Devstral Small 2 vs GLM-4.7-FlashX vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Devstral Small 2 comes out ahead, 67 to 61 and 61 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Devstral Small 2

    Released Dec 9, 2025

    67/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context262K
  2. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.7-FlashX

    Released Jan 19, 2026

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.07 / $0.40
    • Context200K
  3. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2-Flash

    Released Dec 16, 2025Deprecated

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.14 / $0.28
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Devstral Small 2 is our pick

Devstral Small 2 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against GLM-4.7-FlashX (61) and MiMo-V2-Flash (61). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceDevstral Small 2Devstral Small 2 $0.15 · GLM-4.7-FlashX $0.152 · MiMo-V2-Flash $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextDevstral Small 2 and MiMo-V2-FlashDevstral Small 2 262,144 · MiMo-V2-Flash 262,144 · GLM-4.7-FlashX 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsDevstral Small 2Devstral Small 2: Text, Images · GLM-4.7-FlashX: Text · MiMo-V2-Flash: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDevstral Small 2GLM-4.7-FlashXMiMo-V2-Flash
Price50%898986
Inputs & features30%503535
Context window20%373237
Overall100%67/10061/10061/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Devstral Small 2 vs GLM-4.7-FlashX vs MiMo-V2-Flash specifications side by side
SpecificationDevstral Small 2Mistral AIGLM-4.7-FlashXZ.ai (Zhipu)MiMo-V2-FlashXiaomi
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.10$0.07 (best)$0.14
Output$0.30$0.40$0.28 (best)
Cached input—$0.01$0.0028 (best)
Blended (3:1)$0.15 (best)$0.152$0.175
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Z.AI APIOfficial Xiaomi API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)200,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output262,144 tokens (best)131,072 tokens65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0OpenOpen
API model ID—glm-4.7-flashxmimo-v2-flash
API providers18 (best)3
ReleasedDec 9, 2025Jan 19, 2026Dec 16, 2025
Knowledge cutoffDec 2025Apr 2025Dec 1, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Devstral Small 2$1.60
  • GLM-4.7-FlashX$1.50
  • MiMo-V2-Flash$1.96
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Devstral Small 2, GLM-4.7-FlashX or MiMo-V2-Flash?

Devstral Small 2 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against GLM-4.7-FlashX (61) and MiMo-V2-Flash (61). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2, GLM-4.7-FlashX or MiMo-V2-Flash?

Devstral Small 2 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). GLM-4.7-FlashX costs $0.07 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Devstral Small 2 versus $0.152 for GLM-4.7-FlashX (1× as much) and $0.175 for MiMo-V2-Flash (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Devstral Small 2 has not been scored yet, GLM-4.7-FlashX has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2-Flash has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Devstral Small 2, GLM-4.7-FlashX and MiMo-V2-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Devstral Small 2 and MiMo-V2-Flash have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 200,000 for GLM-4.7-FlashX. Maximum output per response: Devstral Small 2 up to 262,144, GLM-4.7-FlashX up to 131,072, MiMo-V2-Flash up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Devstral Small 2 accepts text and images; GLM-4.7-FlashX accepts text; MiMo-V2-Flash accepts text. Devstral Small 2 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

GLM-4.7-FlashX is the newest, released Jan 19, 2026. MiMo-V2-Flash came out Dec 16, 2025; Devstral Small 2 came out Dec 9, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Devstral Small 2 Dec 2025, GLM-4.7-FlashX Apr 2025, MiMo-V2-Flash Dec 1, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.