Devstral Small 2 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.7-FlashX
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 67 and 61 on our weighted score, though Devstral Small 2 is 3.8× cheaper per token.
Mistral AIDevstral Small 2
67/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.30
- Context262K
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $1.50
- Context1.05M
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.7-FlashX
61/100- ECI—
- Price$0.07 / $0.40
- Context200K
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is our pick
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Devstral Small 2 (67) and GLM-4.7-FlashX (61). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceDevstral Small 2Devstral Small 2 $0.15 · GLM-4.7-FlashX $0.152 · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.563 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite 1,048,576 · Devstral Small 2 262,144 · GLM-4.7-FlashX 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteDevstral Small 2: Text, Images · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · GLM-4.7-FlashX: Text
- Self-hostingDevstral Small 2 and GLM-4.7-FlashXPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Devstral Small 2 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7-FlashX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 89 | 62 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 100 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 61 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 67/100 | 73/100 | 61/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Devstral Small 2Mistral AI | Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle | GLM-4.7-FlashXZ.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 | $0.25 | $0.07 (best) |
| Output | $0.30 (best) | $1.50 | $0.40 |
| Cached input | — | $0.025 | $0.01 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15 (best) | $0.563 | $0.152 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Google API | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 200,000 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yesminimal · low · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenApache-2.0 | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | gemini-3.1-flash-lite | glm-4.7-flashx |
| API providers | 1 | 23 (best) | 8 |
| Released | Dec 9, 2025 | May 7, 2026 | Jan 19, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2025 | Jan 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Devstral Small 2$1.60
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$5.50
- GLM-4.7-FlashX$1.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Devstral Small 2, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-4.7-FlashX?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Devstral Small 2 (67) and GLM-4.7-FlashX (61). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-4.7-FlashX?
Devstral Small 2 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). GLM-4.7-FlashX costs $0.07 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Devstral Small 2 versus $0.152 for GLM-4.7-FlashX (1× as much) and $0.563 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (3.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Devstral Small 2 has not been scored yet, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has not been scored yet and GLM-4.7-FlashX has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Devstral Small 2, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM-4.7-FlashX yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Devstral Small 2 and 200,000 for GLM-4.7-FlashX. Maximum output per response: Devstral Small 2 up to 262,144, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite up to 65,536, GLM-4.7-FlashX up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Devstral Small 2 accepts text and images; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; GLM-4.7-FlashX accepts text. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Devstral Small 2 and GLM-4.7-FlashX publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the newest, released May 7, 2026. GLM-4.7-FlashX came out Jan 19, 2026; Devstral Small 2 came out Dec 9, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Devstral Small 2 Dec 2025, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Jan 2025, GLM-4.7-FlashX Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
