Devstral Medium vs Nova 2 Lite vs GLM-4.5V
Nova 2 Lite comes out ahead, 62 to 49 and 39 on our weighted score, though Devstral Medium is 14% cheaper per token.
Mistral AIDevstral Medium
39/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $2.00
- Context128K
- Our pick
AmazonNova 2 Lite
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.33 / $2.75
- Context1M
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5V
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $1.80
- Context64K
Nova 2 Lite is our pick
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GLM-4.5V (49) and Devstral Medium (39). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Devstral Medium wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceDevstral MediumDevstral Medium $0.80 · GLM-4.5V $0.90 · Nova 2 Lite $0.935 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite 1,000,000 · Devstral Medium 128,000 · GLM-4.5V 64,000 tokens
- Widest inputsNova 2 LiteDevstral Medium: Text · Nova 2 Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · GLM-4.5V: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingGLM-4.5VPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Devstral Medium | Nova 2 Lite | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 54 | 51 | 52 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 80 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 60 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 39/100 | 62/100 | 49/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Devstral MediumMistral AI | Nova 2 LiteAmazon | GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.40 | $0.33 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.00 | $2.75 | $1.80 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.083 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.80 (best) | $0.935 | $0.90 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yeslow · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | devstral-medium-2507 | amazon.nova-2-lite-v1:0 | glm-4.5v |
| API providers | 2 | 2 | 11 (best) |
| Released | Jul 10, 2025 | Dec 2, 2025 | Aug 11, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2025 | Oct 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Devstral Medium$8.00
- Nova 2 Lite$8.80
- GLM-4.5V$9.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Devstral Medium, Nova 2 Lite or GLM-4.5V?
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GLM-4.5V (49) and Devstral Medium (39). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Devstral Medium wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Devstral Medium, Nova 2 Lite or GLM-4.5V?
Devstral Medium is cheaper at $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). GLM-4.5V costs $0.60 input / $1.80 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Nova 2 Lite costs $0.33 input / $2.75 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.80 per million tokens for Devstral Medium versus $0.90 for GLM-4.5V (1.1× as much) and $0.935 for Nova 2 Lite (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Devstral Medium has not been scored yet, Nova 2 Lite has not been scored yet and GLM-4.5V has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Devstral Medium, Nova 2 Lite and GLM-4.5V yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Lite has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Devstral Medium and 64,000 for GLM-4.5V. Maximum output per response: Devstral Medium up to 128,000, Nova 2 Lite up to 65,536, GLM-4.5V up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Devstral Medium accepts text; Nova 2 Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video; GLM-4.5V accepts text, images and video. Nova 2 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-4.5V publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Devstral Medium and Nova 2 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nova 2 Lite is the newest, released Dec 2, 2025. GLM-4.5V came out Aug 11, 2025; Devstral Medium came out Jul 10, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Devstral Medium May 2025, Nova 2 Lite Oct 2025, GLM-4.5V Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
