Devstral 2 vs GLM-4.5V vs Nova 2 Lite
Nova 2 Lite comes out ahead, 62 to 49 and 42 on our weighted score, though Devstral 2 is 14% cheaper per token.
Mistral AIDevstral 2
42/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $2.00
- Context262K
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5V
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $1.80
- Context64K
- Our pick
AmazonNova 2 Lite
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.33 / $2.75
- Context1M
Nova 2 Lite is our pick
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GLM-4.5V (49) and Devstral 2 (42). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Devstral 2 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceDevstral 2Devstral 2 $0.80 · GLM-4.5V $0.90 · Nova 2 Lite $0.935 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite 1,000,000 · Devstral 2 262,144 · GLM-4.5V 64,000 tokens
- Widest inputsNova 2 LiteDevstral 2: Text · GLM-4.5V: Text, Images, Video · Nova 2 Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
- Self-hostingDevstral 2 and GLM-4.5VPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Devstral 2 | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 54 | 52 | 51 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 70 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 12 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 49/100 | 62/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Devstral 2Mistral AI | GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu) | Nova 2 LiteAmazon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.40 | $0.60 | $0.33 (best) |
| Output | $2.00 | $1.80 (best) | $2.75 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.083 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.80 (best) | $0.90 | $0.935 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Official Z.AI API | Official Amazon Bedrock API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 64,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | devstral-2512 | glm-4.5v | amazon.nova-2-lite-v1:0 |
| API providers | 14 (best) | 11 | 2 |
| Released | Dec 9, 2025 | Aug 11, 2025 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2025 | Apr 2025 | Oct 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Devstral 2$8.00
- GLM-4.5V$9.60
- Nova 2 Lite$8.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Devstral 2, GLM-4.5V or Nova 2 Lite?
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GLM-4.5V (49) and Devstral 2 (42). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Devstral 2 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Devstral 2, GLM-4.5V or Nova 2 Lite?
Devstral 2 is cheaper at $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). GLM-4.5V costs $0.60 input / $1.80 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Nova 2 Lite costs $0.33 input / $2.75 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.80 per million tokens for Devstral 2 versus $0.90 for GLM-4.5V (1.1× as much) and $0.935 for Nova 2 Lite (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Devstral 2 has not been scored yet, GLM-4.5V has not been scored yet and Nova 2 Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Devstral 2, GLM-4.5V and Nova 2 Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Lite has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Devstral 2 and 64,000 for GLM-4.5V. Maximum output per response: Devstral 2 up to 262,144, GLM-4.5V up to 16,384, Nova 2 Lite up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Devstral 2 accepts text; GLM-4.5V accepts text, images and video; Nova 2 Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Nova 2 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Devstral 2 and GLM-4.5V publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova 2 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Devstral 2 is the newest, released Dec 9, 2025. Nova 2 Lite came out Dec 2, 2025; GLM-4.5V came out Aug 11, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Devstral 2 Dec 2025, GLM-4.5V Apr 2025, Nova 2 Lite Oct 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
