DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
DeepSeek V4 Pro comes out ahead, 45 to 41 on our weighted score, though MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed is 40% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
45/100- ECI—
- Price$1.32 / $3.00
- Context1M
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
DeepSeek V4 Pro is our pick
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (41). It leads on inputs & features and context window. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed $1.05 · DeepSeek V4 Pro $1.74 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextDeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek V4 Pro 1,000,000 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsDeepSeek V4 Pro: Text · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek V4 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 38 | 49 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 45 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 45/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.32 | $0.60 (best) |
| Output | $3.00 | $2.40 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.74 | $1.05 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 49 providers | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 384,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed |
| API providers | 52 (best) | 14 |
| Released | Apr 24, 2026 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro$19.20
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed$10.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Pro or MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (41). It leads on inputs & features and context window. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed?
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed is cheaper at $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.32 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 49 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.05 per million tokens for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed versus $1.74 for DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. DeepSeek V4 Pro has not been scored yet and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V4 Pro and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Pro has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 384,000, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts text; MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the newest, released Apr 24, 2026. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed came out Mar 18, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek V4 Pro May 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GLM-5V-TurboThree-way comparison
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomi
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek
