ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Too close to call on our weighted score (DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 50, GLM-5V-Turbo 49, DeepSeek V4 Pro 45). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek V4 Pro

    Released Apr 24, 2026

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.32 / $3.00
    • Context1M
  2. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

    Released Aug 12, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI155.4
    • Price$0.66 / $1.98
    • Context1M
  3. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5V-Turbo

    Released Apr 1, 2026

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.00
    • Context200K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 50/100, GLM-5V-Turbo 49/100, DeepSeek V4 Pro 45/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $0.99 · DeepSeek V4 Pro $1.74 · GLM-5V-Turbo $1.90 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextDeepSeek V4 Pro and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek V4 Pro 1,000,000 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1,000,000 · GLM-5V-Turbo 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGLM-5V-TurboDeepSeek V4 Pro: Text · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Text · GLM-5V-Turbo: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 Pro and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Publishes downloadable weights (MIT)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GLM-5V-Turbo
Price50%385037
Inputs & features30%454580
Context window20%606032
Overall100%45/10050/10049/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5V-Turbo specifications side by side
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekGLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—155.4—
ECI rank—#26 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—91.7%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—64.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—98.6%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—52.9%—
Price per million tokens
Input$1.32$0.66 (best)$1.20
Output$3.00$1.98 (best)$4.00
Cached input—$0.022 (best)$0.24
Blended (3:1)$1.74$0.99 (best)$1.90
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 49 providersOfficial DeepSeek APIOfficial Z.AI API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens (best)200,000 tokens
Max output384,000 tokens (best)384,000 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningYesYeslow · high · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenMITProprietary
API model ID—deepseek-v4-proglm-5v-turbo
API providers52 (best)3714
ReleasedApr 24, 2026Aug 12, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Knowledge cutoffMay 2025——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • DeepSeek V4 Pro$19.20
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$10.56
  • GLM-5V-Turbo$20.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GLM-5V-Turbo?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 50/100, GLM-5V-Turbo 49/100, DeepSeek V4 Pro 45/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GLM-5V-Turbo?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper at $0.66 input / $1.98 output per million tokens (official DeepSeek API price). DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.32 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 49 API providers); GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.20 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.99 per million tokens for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $1.74 for DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.8× as much) and $1.90 for GLM-5V-Turbo (1.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. DeepSeek V4 Pro has not been scored yet, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has an ECI of 155.4 and GLM-5V-Turbo has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GLM-5V-Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Pro and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 have the largest context windows (1,000,000 and 1,000,000 tokens), against 200,000 for GLM-5V-Turbo. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 384,000, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 up to 384,000, GLM-5V-Turbo up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts text; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 accepts text; GLM-5V-Turbo accepts text, images, PDFs and video. GLM-5V-Turbo handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek V4 Pro and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; GLM-5V-Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the newest, released Aug 12, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro came out Apr 24, 2026; GLM-5V-Turbo came out Apr 1, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek V4 Pro May 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.