DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3 235B-A22B
Gemini 3.6 Flash comes out ahead, 73 to 68 and 51 on our weighted score, though DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 34% cheaper per token.
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
68/100- ECI155.4
- Price$0.66 / $1.98
- Context1M
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 3.6 Flash
73/100- ECI154.3
- Price$0.75 / $3.75
- Context1.05M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 235B-A22B
51/100- ECI139.4
- Price$0.70 / $2.80
- Context131K
Gemini 3.6 Flash is our pick
Gemini 3.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (68) and Qwen3 235B-A22B (51). It leads on inputs & features. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 155.4 · Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.3 · Qwen3 235B-A22B 139.4
- Lowest priceDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $0.99 · Qwen3 235B-A22B $1.23 · Gemini 3.6 Flash $1.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash 1,048,576 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1,000,000 · Qwen3 235B-A22B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Text · Gemini 3.6 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Qwen3 235B-A22B: Text
- Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3 235B-A22BPublishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 85 | 84 | 65 |
| Price | 25% | 50 | 42 | 46 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 45 | 100 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 61 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 73/100 | 51/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek | Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle | Qwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 155.4 (best) | 154.3 | 139.4 |
| ECI rank | #26 of 148 (best) | #34 of 148 | #103 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 91.7% | 94.1% (best) | 70.7% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 64.6% (best) | 59.0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 98.6% (best) | 94.2% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 52.9% | 66.2% (best) | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.66 (best) | $0.75 | $0.70 |
| Output | $1.98 (best) | $3.75 | $2.80 |
| Cached input | $0.022 (best) | $0.075 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.99 (best) | $1.50 | $1.23 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official DeepSeek API | Official Google API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 384,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · high · max | Yesminimal · low · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenMIT | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | deepseek-v4-pro | gemini-3.6-flash | qwen3-235b-a22b |
| API providers | 37 (best) | 25 | 7 |
| Released | Aug 12, 2026 | Jul 21, 2026 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Mar 2026 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$10.56
- Gemini 3.6 Flash$15.00
- Qwen3 235B-A22B$12.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B-A22B?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (68) and Qwen3 235B-A22B (51). It leads on inputs & features. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B-A22B?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper at $0.66 input / $1.98 output per million tokens (official DeepSeek API price). Qwen3 235B-A22B costs $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 input / $3.75 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.99 per million tokens for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $1.23 for Qwen3 235B-A22B (1.2× as much) and $1.50 for Gemini 3.6 Flash (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 155.4 (#26 of 148), Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.3 (#34 of 148) and Qwen3 235B-A22B 139.4 (#103 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (153.7–157.6 vs 152.6–156.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3.6 Flash 94.1%, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 91.7%, Qwen3 235B-A22B 70.7%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 235B-A22B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 131,072 for Qwen3 235B-A22B. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 up to 384,000, Gemini 3.6 Flash up to 65,536, Qwen3 235B-A22B up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 accepts text; Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Qwen3 235B-A22B accepts text. Gemini 3.6 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3 235B-A22B publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3.6 Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the newest, released Aug 12, 2026. Gemini 3.6 Flash came out Jul 21, 2026; Qwen3 235B-A22B came out Apr 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.6 Flash Mar 2026, Qwen3 235B-A22B Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Spark 1.2Meta · ECI 155.0
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 155.8
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI · ECI 156.5
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1Meta · ECI 154.3
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 155.8
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.5xAI · ECI 154.0
