DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
Too close to call on our weighted score (DeepSeek V4 Flash 71, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT 70). The right pick depends on what you value most.
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash
71/100- ECI146.1
- Price$0.14 / $0.28
- Context1M
GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B IT
70/100- ECI141.9
- Price$0.10 / $0.38
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (DeepSeek V4 Flash 71/100, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT 70/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek V4 Flash for raw capability and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityDeepSeek V4 FlashCapabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V4 Flash 146.1 · Gemma 4 26B A4B IT 141.9
- Lowest priceGemma 4 26B A4B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT $0.17 · DeepSeek V4 Flash $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextDeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V4 Flash 1,000,000 · Gemma 4 26B A4B IT 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsGemma 4 26B A4B ITDeepSeek V4 Flash: Text · Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 73 | 68 |
| Price | 25% | 86 | 86 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 45 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 71/100 | 70/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek | Gemma 4 26B A4B ITGoogle |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 146.1 (best) | 141.9 |
| ECI rank | #71 of 148 (best) | #93 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 73.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 82.2% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.14 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $0.28 (best) | $0.38 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 | $0.17 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 42 providers | Median of 23 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 384,000 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | gemma-4-26b-a4b-it |
| API providers | 48 (best) | 26 |
| Released | Apr 24, 2026 | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash$1.96
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT$1.76
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Flash or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (DeepSeek V4 Flash 71/100, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT 70/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek V4 Flash for raw capability and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.38 output per million tokens (median across 23 API providers). DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (median across 42 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.17 per million tokens for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT versus $0.175 for DeepSeek V4 Flash (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V4 Flash 146.1 (#71 of 148) and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT 141.9 (#93 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (143.6–147.9 vs 138.4–143.4), so the gap is a real one.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, DeepSeek V4 Flash leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V4 Flash up to 384,000, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts text; Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts text and images. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is the newest, released Apr 24, 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT came out Apr 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek V4 Flash May 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3.5 FlashThree-way comparison
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.5 FlashAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 144.0
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B ITGoogle · ECI 142.8
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI · ECI 145.8
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax · ECI 145.9
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5 FlashAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 144.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GPT-5 NanoOpenAI · ECI 139.4
