ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

DeepSeek-V3 vs QwQ Plus vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 63 to 52 and 50 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek-V3

    Released Dec 26, 2024

    50/100
    • ECI132.3
    • Price$0.32 / $1.10
    • Context131K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    QwQ Plus

    Released Mar 5, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.80 / $2.40
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct

    Released Apr 5, 2025

    63/100
    • ECI132.2
    • Price$0.321 / $0.91
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is our pick

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against QwQ Plus (52) and DeepSeek-V3 (50). It leads on capability, price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because QwQ Plus has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructShared benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 67.0% · QwQ Plus 65.4% · DeepSeek-V3 56.5%
  • Lowest priceLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct $0.468 · DeepSeek-V3 $0.515 · QwQ Plus $1.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 1,000,000 · DeepSeek-V3 131,072 · QwQ Plus 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructDeepSeek-V3: Text · QwQ Plus: Text · Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek-V3 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (DeepSeek Model License)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDeepSeek-V3QwQ PlusLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%576567
Price25%644666
Inputs & features15%253550
Context window10%242460
Overall100%50/10052/10063/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

DeepSeek-V3 vs QwQ Plus vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationDeepSeek-V3DeepSeekQwQ PlusAlibaba (Qwen)Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)132.3 (best)—132.2
ECI rank#121 of 148 (best)—#122 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions56.5%65.4%67.0% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics15.8%—20.6% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.32 (best)$0.80$0.321
Output$1.10$2.40$0.91 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.515$1.20$0.468 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 5 providersOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 6 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output8,192 tokens8,192 tokens16,384 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenDeepSeek Model LicenseProprietaryOpen
API model ID—qwq-plus—
API providers526 (best)
ReleasedDec 26, 2024Mar 5, 2025Apr 5, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 2024Aug 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • DeepSeek-V3$5.40
  • QwQ Plus$12.80
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct$5.03
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: DeepSeek-V3, QwQ Plus or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against QwQ Plus (52) and DeepSeek-V3 (50). It leads on capability, price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because QwQ Plus has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3, QwQ Plus or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is cheaper at $0.321 input / $0.91 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers). DeepSeek-V3 costs $0.32 input / $1.10 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); QwQ Plus costs $0.80 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.468 per million tokens for Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct versus $0.515 for DeepSeek-V3 (1.1× as much) and $1.20 for QwQ Plus (2.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond): Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 67.0%, QwQ Plus 65.4% and DeepSeek-V3 56.5%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 67.0%, QwQ Plus 65.4%, DeepSeek-V3 56.5%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek-V3, QwQ Plus and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for DeepSeek-V3 and 131,072 for QwQ Plus. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek-V3 up to 8,192, QwQ Plus up to 8,192, Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

DeepSeek-V3 accepts text; QwQ Plus accepts text; Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct accepts text and images. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct publishes its weights (DeepSeek Model License) and can be self-hosted; QwQ Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 5, 2025. QwQ Plus came out Mar 5, 2025; DeepSeek-V3 came out Dec 26, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: QwQ Plus Apr 2024, Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct Aug 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.