ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

DeepSeek-V3 vs Magistral Small vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 58 to 50 and 50 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek-V3

    Released Dec 26, 2024

    50/100
    • ECI132.3
    • Price$0.32 / $1.10
    • Context131K
  2. Mistral AI

    Magistral Small

    Released Jun 10, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI133.2
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct

    Released Apr 5, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI132.2
    • Price$0.321 / $0.91
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is our pick

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Magistral Small (50) and DeepSeek-V3 (50). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMagistral SmallCapabilities Index (ECI): Magistral Small 133.2 · DeepSeek-V3 132.3 · Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 132.2
  • Lowest priceLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct $0.468 · DeepSeek-V3 $0.515 · Magistral Small $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 1,000,000 · DeepSeek-V3 131,072 · Magistral Small 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructDeepSeek-V3: Text · Magistral Small: Text · Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDeepSeek-V3Magistral SmallLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%565756
Price25%645666
Inputs & features15%253550
Context window10%242460
Overall100%50/10050/10058/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

DeepSeek-V3 vs Magistral Small vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationDeepSeek-V3DeepSeekMagistral SmallMistral AILlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)132.3133.2 (best)132.2
ECI rank#121 of 148#120 of 148 (best)#122 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions56.5%56.1%67.0% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics15.8%30.0% (best)20.6%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.32 (best)$0.50$0.321
Output$1.10$1.50$0.91 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.515$0.75$0.468 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 5 providersMedian of 1 providersMedian of 6 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output8,192 tokens8,192 tokens16,384 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenDeepSeek Model LicenseOpenApache 2.0Open
API model ID———
API providers516 (best)
ReleasedDec 26, 2024Jun 10, 2025Apr 5, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——Aug 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • DeepSeek-V3$5.40
  • Magistral Small$8.00
  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct$5.03
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: DeepSeek-V3, Magistral Small or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Magistral Small (50) and DeepSeek-V3 (50). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3, Magistral Small or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is cheaper at $0.321 input / $0.91 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers). DeepSeek-V3 costs $0.32 input / $1.10 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); Magistral Small costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.468 per million tokens for Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct versus $0.515 for DeepSeek-V3 (1.1× as much) and $0.75 for Magistral Small (1.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Magistral Small scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Magistral Small 133.2 (#120 of 148), DeepSeek-V3 132.3 (#121 of 148) and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 132.2 (#122 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (128.9–134.4 vs 127.5–135.5), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 67.0%, DeepSeek-V3 56.5%, Magistral Small 56.1%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Magistral Small 30.0%, Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 20.6%, DeepSeek-V3 15.8%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek-V3, Magistral Small and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Magistral Small leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for DeepSeek-V3 and 131,072 for Magistral Small. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek-V3 up to 8,192, Magistral Small up to 8,192, Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

DeepSeek-V3 accepts text; Magistral Small accepts text; Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct accepts text and images. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (DeepSeek Model License and Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Magistral Small is the newest, released Jun 10, 2025. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct came out Apr 5, 2025; DeepSeek-V3 came out Dec 26, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct Aug 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.