ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Qwen3 14B

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3 14B 54, DeepSeek V3 0324 54). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek V3 0324

    Released Mar 24, 2025

    54/100
    • ECI135.9
    • Price$0.24 / $0.90
    • Context164K
    Full specs Remove DeepSeek V3 0324

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 14B

    Released Apr 29, 2025

    54/100
    • ECI138.2
    • Price$0.35 / $1.40
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3 14B

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 14B 54/100, DeepSeek V3 0324 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 14B for raw capability, DeepSeek V3 0324 on price and DeepSeek V3 0324 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityQwen3 14BCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 14B 138.2 · DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek V3 0324 $0.405 · Qwen3 14B $0.613 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek V3 0324 163,840 · Qwen3 14B 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsDeepSeek V3 0324: Text · Qwen3 14B: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDeepSeek V3 0324Qwen3 14B
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%6063
Price25%6860
Inputs & features15%2535
Context window10%2824
Overall100%54/10054/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Qwen3 14B specifications side by side
SpecificationDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeekQwen3 14BAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)135.9138.2 (best)
ECI rank#114 of 148#107 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions67.6% (best)63.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics37.8%66.4% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.24 (best)$0.35
Output$0.90 (best)$1.40
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.405 (best)$0.613
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 5 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window163,840 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Max output163,840 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpen
API model ID—qwen3-14b
API providers5 (best)1
ReleasedMar 24, 2025Apr 29, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • DeepSeek V3 0324$4.20
  • Qwen3 14B$6.30
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: DeepSeek V3 0324 or Qwen3 14B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 14B 54/100, DeepSeek V3 0324 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 14B for raw capability, DeepSeek V3 0324 on price and DeepSeek V3 0324 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Qwen3 14B?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is cheaper at $0.24 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Qwen3 14B costs $0.35 input / $1.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.405 per million tokens for DeepSeek V3 0324 versus $0.613 for Qwen3 14B (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 14B 138.2 (#107 of 148) and DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9 (#114 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (133.5–140.1 vs 132.4–138.0), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — DeepSeek V3 0324 67.6%, Qwen3 14B 63.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3 14B 66.4%, DeepSeek V3 0324 37.8%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Qwen3 14B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3 14B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V3 0324 has the largest context window at 163,840 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3 14B. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V3 0324 up to 163,840, Qwen3 14B up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

DeepSeek V3 0324 accepts text; Qwen3 14B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 14B is the newest, released Apr 29, 2025. DeepSeek V3 0324 came out Mar 24, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 14B Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons