ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 62 to 54 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek V3 0324

    Released Mar 24, 2025

    54/100
    • ECI135.9
    • Price$0.24 / $0.90
    • Context164K
    Full specs Remove DeepSeek V3 0324
  2. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

    Released Apr 5, 2025

    62/100
    • ECI129.7
    • Price$0.225 / $0.69
    • Context10M
    Full specs Remove Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is our pick

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against DeepSeek V3 0324 (54). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. DeepSeek V3 0324 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityDeepSeek V3 0324Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7
  • Lowest priceLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.341 · DeepSeek V3 0324 $0.405 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · DeepSeek V3 0324 163,840 tokens
  • Widest inputsLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructDeepSeek V3 0324: Text · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDeepSeek V3 0324Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%6052
Price25%6872
Inputs & features15%2550
Context window10%28100
Overall100%54/10062/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationDeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeekLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructMeta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)135.9 (best)129.7
ECI rank#114 of 148 (best)#126 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions67.6% (best)51.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics37.8% (best)7.8%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.24$0.225 (best)
Output$0.90$0.69 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.405$0.341 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 5 providersMedian of 4 providers
Limits
Context window163,840 tokens10,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output163,840 tokens (best)16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpen
API model ID——
API providers5 (best)4
ReleasedMar 24, 2025Apr 5, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Aug 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • DeepSeek V3 0324$4.20
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$3.63
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: DeepSeek V3 0324 or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against DeepSeek V3 0324 (54). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. DeepSeek V3 0324 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is cheaper at $0.225 input / $0.69 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.24 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.341 per million tokens for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct versus $0.405 for DeepSeek V3 0324 (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

DeepSeek V3 0324 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek V3 0324 135.9 (#114 of 148) and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 (#126 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (132.4–138.0 vs 124.8–131.4), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — DeepSeek V3 0324 67.6%, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — DeepSeek V3 0324 37.8%, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 7.8%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, DeepSeek V3 0324 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 163,840 for DeepSeek V3 0324. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek V3 0324 up to 163,840, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

DeepSeek V3 0324 accepts text; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images. Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 5, 2025. DeepSeek V3 0324 came out Mar 24, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons