ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

DeepSeek-R1 vs Pixtral 12B vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

Pixtral 12B comes out ahead, 64 to 39 and 38 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek-R1

    Released Jan 20, 2025

    39/100
    • ECI139.0
    • Price$0.70 / $2.60
    • Context128K
  2. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Pixtral 12B

    Released Sep 1, 2024

    64/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context128K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 235B-A22B

    Released Apr 28, 2025

    38/100
    • ECI139.4
    • Price$0.70 / $2.80
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Pixtral 12B is our pick

Pixtral 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against DeepSeek-R1 (39) and Qwen3 235B-A22B (38). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest pricePixtral 12BPixtral 12B $0.15 · DeepSeek-R1 $1.18 · Qwen3 235B-A22B $1.23 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 235B-A22BQwen3 235B-A22B 131,072 · DeepSeek-R1 128,000 · Pixtral 12B 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPixtral 12BDeepSeek-R1: Text · Pixtral 12B: Text, Images · Qwen3 235B-A22B: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightDeepSeek-R1Pixtral 12BQwen3 235B-A22B
Price50%478946
Inputs & features30%355035
Context window20%242424
Overall100%39/10064/10038/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

DeepSeek-R1 vs Pixtral 12B vs Qwen3 235B-A22B specifications side by side
SpecificationDeepSeek-R1DeepSeekPixtral 12BMistral AIQwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)139.0—139.4 (best)
ECI rank#104 of 148—#103 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions71.7% (best)—70.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics53.3%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.70$0.15 (best)$0.70
Output$2.60$0.15 (best)$2.80
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$1.18$0.15 (best)$1.23
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 11 providersOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Max output32,768 tokens128,000 tokens (best)16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model ID—pixtral-12bqwen3-235b-a22b
API providers12 (best)47
ReleasedJan 20, 2025Sep 1, 2024Apr 28, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJul 2024Sep 2024Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • DeepSeek-R1$12.20
  • Pixtral 12B$1.80
  • Qwen3 235B-A22B$12.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: DeepSeek-R1, Pixtral 12B or Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Pixtral 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against DeepSeek-R1 (39) and Qwen3 235B-A22B (38). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1, Pixtral 12B or Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Pixtral 12B is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). DeepSeek-R1 costs $0.70 input / $2.60 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers); Qwen3 235B-A22B costs $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Pixtral 12B versus $1.18 for DeepSeek-R1 (7.8× as much) and $1.23 for Qwen3 235B-A22B (8.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. DeepSeek-R1 has an ECI of 139.0, Pixtral 12B has not been scored yet and Qwen3 235B-A22B has an ECI of 139.4.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek-R1, Pixtral 12B and Qwen3 235B-A22B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 235B-A22B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for DeepSeek-R1 and 128,000 for Pixtral 12B. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek-R1 up to 32,768, Pixtral 12B up to 128,000, Qwen3 235B-A22B up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

DeepSeek-R1 accepts text; Pixtral 12B accepts text and images; Qwen3 235B-A22B accepts text. Pixtral 12B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the newest, released Apr 28, 2025. DeepSeek-R1 came out Jan 20, 2025; Pixtral 12B came out Sep 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek-R1 Jul 2024, Pixtral 12B Sep 2024, Qwen3 235B-A22B Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.