DeepSeek-R1 vs GPT-4.1 mini vs Mistral Medium 3
GPT-4.1 mini comes out ahead, 60 to 53 and 51 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
51/100- ECI139.0
- Price$0.70 / $2.60
- Context128K
- Our pick
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
60/100- ECI135.0
- Price$0.40 / $1.60
- Context1.05M
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3
53/100- ECI134.1
- Price$0.40 / $2.00
- Context131K
GPT-4.1 mini is our pick
GPT-4.1 mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against Mistral Medium 3 (53) and DeepSeek-R1 (51). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. DeepSeek-R1 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityDeepSeek-R1Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek-R1 139.0 · GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 · Mistral Medium 3 134.1
- Lowest priceGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 mini $0.70 · Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 · DeepSeek-R1 $1.18 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 mini 1,047,576 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 · DeepSeek-R1 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4.1 miniDeepSeek-R1: Text · GPT-4.1 mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Mistral Medium 3: Text, Images
- Self-hostingDeepSeek-R1Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek-R1 | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 64 | 59 | 58 |
| Price | 25% | 47 | 57 | 54 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 35 | 70 | 50 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 61 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 60/100 | 53/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 139.0 (best) | 135.0 | 134.1 |
| ECI rank | #104 of 148 (best) | #115 of 148 | #117 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 71.7% (best) | 65.9% | 59.5% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 6.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 53.3% (best) | 44.7% | 32.2% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 12.7% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.70 | $0.40 (best) | $0.40 (best) |
| Output | $2.60 | $1.60 (best) | $2.00 |
| Cached input | — | $0.10 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.18 | $0.70 (best) | $0.80 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 11 providers | Official OpenAI API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 1,047,576 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | gpt-4.1-mini | mistral-medium-2505 |
| API providers | 12 | 24 (best) | 5 |
| Released | Jan 20, 2025 | Apr 14, 2025 | May 7, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jul 2024 | Apr 2024 | May 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
DeepSeek-R1$12.20
GPT-4.1 mini$7.20
Mistral Medium 3$8.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4.1 mini or Mistral Medium 3?
GPT-4.1 mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against Mistral Medium 3 (53) and DeepSeek-R1 (51). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. DeepSeek-R1 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4.1 mini or Mistral Medium 3?
GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper at $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); DeepSeek-R1 costs $0.70 input / $2.60 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.70 per million tokens for GPT-4.1 mini versus $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3 (1.1× as much) and $1.18 for DeepSeek-R1 (1.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
DeepSeek-R1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek-R1 139.0 (#104 of 148), GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 (#115 of 148) and Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (136.2–140.4 vs 131.2–136.6), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — DeepSeek-R1 71.7%, GPT-4.1 mini 65.9%, Mistral Medium 3 59.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — DeepSeek-R1 53.3%, GPT-4.1 mini 44.7%, Mistral Medium 3 32.2%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4.1 mini and Mistral Medium 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, DeepSeek-R1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 mini has the largest context window at 1,047,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3 and 128,000 for DeepSeek-R1. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek-R1 up to 32,768, GPT-4.1 mini up to 32,768, Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek-R1 accepts text; GPT-4.1 mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images. GPT-4.1 mini handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek-R1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4.1 mini and Mistral Medium 3 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Mistral Medium 3 is the newest, released May 7, 2025. GPT-4.1 mini came out Apr 14, 2025; DeepSeek-R1 came out Jan 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek-R1 Jul 2024, GPT-4.1 mini Apr 2024, Mistral Medium 3 May 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.