DeepSeek OCR 2 vs Trendyol Asure 12B vs Trinity Large Preview
Trinity Large Preview comes out ahead, 34 to 25 and 15 on our weighted score.
DeepSeekDeepSeek OCR 2
15/100- ECI—
- Price$0.89 / $1.47
- Context8K
Trendyol
Trendyol Asure 12B
25/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context131K
- Our pick
Arcee AITrinity Large Preview
34/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context524K
Trinity Large Preview is our pick
Trinity Large Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 34/100 against Trendyol Asure 12B (25) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (15). It leads on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceTrendyol Asure 12BTrendyol Asure 12B $0.20 · DeepSeek OCR 2 $1.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Trinity Large Preview unpriced
- Longest contextTrinity Large PreviewTrinity Large Preview 524,288 · Trendyol Asure 12B 131,072 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsDeepSeek OCR 2 and Trendyol Asure 12BDeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images · Trendyol Asure 12B: Text, Images · Trinity Large Preview: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek OCR 2 | Trendyol Asure 12B | Trinity Large Preview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 24 | 49 |
| Overall | 100% | 15/100 | 25/100 | 34/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek | Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol | Trinity Large PreviewArcee AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.89 | $0.10 (best) | — |
| Output | $1.47 | $0.50 (best) | — |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.03 | $0.20 (best) | — |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | — |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 1 providers | — |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 8,192 tokens | 131,072 tokens | 524,288 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | — | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | OpenGemma | OpenOpenMDW-1.1 |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 2 (best) | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Jan 27, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 | Jan 27, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek OCR 2$11.83
- Trendyol Asure 12B$2.00
- Trinity Large Preview—
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek OCR 2, Trendyol Asure 12B or Trinity Large Preview?
Trinity Large Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 34/100 against Trendyol Asure 12B (25) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (15). It leads on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek OCR 2, Trendyol Asure 12B or Trinity Large Preview?
Trendyol Asure 12B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). DeepSeek OCR 2 costs $0.89 input / $1.47 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Trendyol Asure 12B versus $1.03 for DeepSeek OCR 2 (5.2× as much). Trinity Large Preview has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet, Trendyol Asure 12B has not been scored yet and Trinity Large Preview has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek OCR 2, Trendyol Asure 12B and Trinity Large Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 and Trendyol Asure 12B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Trinity Large Preview has the largest context window at 524,288 tokens, against 131,072 for Trendyol Asure 12B and 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192, Trinity Large Preview up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images; Trendyol Asure 12B accepts text and images; Trinity Large Preview accepts text. DeepSeek OCR 2 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (Gemma and OpenMDW-1.1), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. DeepSeek OCR 2 came out Jan 27, 2026; Trinity Large Preview came out Jan 27, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
