DeepSeek OCR 2 vs Seed 1.6 Flash vs Trinity Mini
Seed 1.6 Flash comes out ahead, 78 to 65 and 32 on our weighted score.
DeepSeekDeepSeek OCR 2
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.89 / $1.47
- Context8K
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 1.6 Flash
78/100- ECI—
- Price$0.022 / $0.223
- Context256K
Arcee AITrinity Mini
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.045 / $0.15
- Context131K
Seed 1.6 Flash is our pick
Seed 1.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Trinity Mini (65) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceTrinity MiniTrinity Mini $0.071 · Seed 1.6 Flash $0.072 · DeepSeek OCR 2 $1.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 1.6 FlashSeed 1.6 Flash 256,000 · Trinity Mini 131,072 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsDeepSeek OCR 2 and Seed 1.6 FlashDeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images · Seed 1.6 Flash: Text, Images · Trinity Mini: Text
- Self-hostingDeepSeek OCR 2 and Trinity MiniPublishes downloadable weights (OpenMDW-1.1)
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek OCR 2 | Seed 1.6 Flash | Trinity Mini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 100 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 36 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 32/100 | 78/100 | 65/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek | Seed 1.6 FlashByteDance Seed | Trinity MiniArcee AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.89 | $0.022 (best) | $0.045 |
| Output | $1.47 | $0.223 | $0.15 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.0044 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.03 | $0.072 | $0.071 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.045 / $0.445 | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Volcengine Ark API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 8,192 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 32,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | OpenOpenMDW-1.1 |
| API model ID | — | doubao-seed-1-6-flash-250828 | — |
| API providers | 2 (best) | 2 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Jan 27, 2026 | Aug 28, 2025 | Dec 1, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek OCR 2$11.83
- Seed 1.6 Flash$0.668
- Trinity Mini$0.75
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek OCR 2, Seed 1.6 Flash or Trinity Mini?
Seed 1.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Trinity Mini (65) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek OCR 2, Seed 1.6 Flash or Trinity Mini?
Trinity Mini is cheaper at $0.045 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 1.6 Flash costs $0.022 input / $0.223 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); DeepSeek OCR 2 costs $0.89 input / $1.47 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.071 per million tokens for Trinity Mini versus $0.072 for Seed 1.6 Flash (1× as much) and $1.03 for DeepSeek OCR 2 (15× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet, Seed 1.6 Flash has not been scored yet and Trinity Mini has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek OCR 2, Seed 1.6 Flash and Trinity Mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 1.6 Flash has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Trinity Mini and 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192, Seed 1.6 Flash up to 32,000, Trinity Mini up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images; Seed 1.6 Flash accepts text and images; Trinity Mini accepts text. DeepSeek OCR 2 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek OCR 2 and Trinity Mini publishes its weights (OpenMDW-1.1) and can be self-hosted; Seed 1.6 Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek OCR 2 is the newest, released Jan 27, 2026. Trinity Mini came out Dec 1, 2025; Seed 1.6 Flash came out Aug 28, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
