DeepSeek OCR 2 vs Mistral Large 3 vs Nova 2 Lite
Nova 2 Lite comes out ahead, 62 to 50 and 32 on our weighted score, though Mistral Large 3 is 20% cheaper per token.
DeepSeekDeepSeek OCR 2
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.89 / $1.47
- Context8K
Mistral AIMistral Large 3
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context262K
- Our pick
AmazonNova 2 Lite
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.33 / $2.75
- Context1M
Nova 2 Lite is our pick
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Mistral Large 3 (50) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Mistral Large 3 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMistral Large 3Mistral Large 3 $0.75 · Nova 2 Lite $0.935 · DeepSeek OCR 2 $1.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite 1,000,000 · Mistral Large 3 262,144 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsNova 2 LiteDeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images · Mistral Large 3: Text, Images · Nova 2 Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
- Self-hostingDeepSeek OCR 2 and Mistral Large 3Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | DeepSeek OCR 2 | Mistral Large 3 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 56 | 51 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 50 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 37 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 32/100 | 50/100 | 62/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | Nova 2 LiteAmazon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.89 | $0.50 | $0.33 (best) |
| Output | $1.47 (best) | $1.50 | $2.75 |
| Cached input | — | $0.05 (best) | $0.083 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.03 | $0.75 (best) | $0.935 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Mistral API | Official Amazon Bedrock API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 8,192 tokens | 262,144 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | mistral-large-2512 | amazon.nova-2-lite-v1:0 |
| API providers | 2 | 13 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Jan 27, 2026 | Dec 2, 2025 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Nov 2024 | Oct 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- DeepSeek OCR 2$11.83
- Mistral Large 3$8.00
- Nova 2 Lite$8.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: DeepSeek OCR 2, Mistral Large 3 or Nova 2 Lite?
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Mistral Large 3 (50) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Mistral Large 3 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek OCR 2, Mistral Large 3 or Nova 2 Lite?
Mistral Large 3 is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Nova 2 Lite costs $0.33 input / $2.75 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price); DeepSeek OCR 2 costs $0.89 input / $1.47 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.75 per million tokens for Mistral Large 3 versus $0.935 for Nova 2 Lite (1.2× as much) and $1.03 for DeepSeek OCR 2 (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet, Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet and Nova 2 Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for DeepSeek OCR 2, Mistral Large 3 and Nova 2 Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Lite has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Mistral Large 3 and 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192, Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144, Nova 2 Lite up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images; Nova 2 Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Nova 2 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek OCR 2 and Mistral Large 3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova 2 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek OCR 2 is the newest, released Jan 27, 2026. Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025; Nova 2 Lite came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024, Nova 2 Lite Oct 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
