Command R7B Arabic vs Phi-4-mini
Command R7B Arabic comes out ahead, 62 to 58 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
CohereCommand R7B Arabic
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.037 / $0.15
- Context128K
MicrosoftPhi-4-mini
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.075 / $0.30
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Command R7B Arabic is our pick
Command R7B Arabic is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Phi-4-mini (58). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCommand R7B ArabicCommand R7B Arabic $0.066 · Phi-4-mini $0.131 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameCommand R7B Arabic 128,000 · Phi-4-mini 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsCommand R7B Arabic: Text · Phi-4-mini: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Command R7B Arabic | Phi-4-mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 92 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 62/100 | 58/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Command R7B ArabicCohere | Phi-4-miniMicrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.037 (best) | $0.075 |
| Output | $0.15 (best) | $0.30 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.066 (best) | $0.131 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Cohere API | Official Azure API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 4,000 tokens | 4,096 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | command-r7b-arabic-02-2025 | phi-4-mini |
| API providers | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Feb 27, 2025 | Dec 11, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 1, 2024 | Oct 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Command R7B Arabic$0.675
- Phi-4-mini$1.35
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Command R7B Arabic or Phi-4-mini?
Command R7B Arabic is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Phi-4-mini (58). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Command R7B Arabic or Phi-4-mini?
Command R7B Arabic is cheaper at $0.037 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Phi-4-mini costs $0.075 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Azure API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.066 per million tokens for Command R7B Arabic versus $0.131 for Phi-4-mini (2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Command R7B Arabic has not been scored yet and Phi-4-mini has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command R7B Arabic and Phi-4-mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command R7B Arabic and Phi-4-mini share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Command R7B Arabic up to 4,000, Phi-4-mini up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Command R7B Arabic accepts text; Phi-4-mini accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Command R7B Arabic is the newest, released Feb 27, 2025. Phi-4-mini came out Dec 11, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Command R7B Arabic Jun 1, 2024, Phi-4-mini Oct 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
