ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Command R vs Pixtral 12B vs Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct

Pixtral 12B comes out ahead, 64 to 58 and 51 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Cohere

    Command R

    Released Aug 30, 2024

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context128K
  2. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Pixtral 12B

    Released Sep 1, 2024

    64/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context128K
  3. Meta

    Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct

    Released Sep 25, 2024

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.197 / $0.51
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Pixtral 12B is our pick

Pixtral 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (58) and Command R (51). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest pricePixtral 12BPixtral 12B $0.15 · Command R $0.263 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameCommand R 128,000 · Pixtral 12B 128,000 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPixtral 12B and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructCommand R: Text · Pixtral 12B: Text, Images · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightCommand RPixtral 12BLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
Price50%778976
Inputs & features30%255050
Context window20%242424
Overall100%51/10064/10058/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Command R vs Pixtral 12B vs Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationCommand RCoherePixtral 12BMistral AILlama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMeta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15 (best)$0.15 (best)$0.197
Output$0.60$0.15 (best)$0.51
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.263$0.15 (best)$0.275
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Cohere APIOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output4,000 tokens128,000 tokens (best)4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model IDcommand-r-08-2024pixtral-12b—
API providers5 (best)42
ReleasedAug 30, 2024Sep 1, 2024Sep 25, 2024
Knowledge cutoffJun 1, 2024Sep 2024Dec 2023
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Command R$2.70
  • Pixtral 12B$1.80
  • Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct$2.99
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Command R, Pixtral 12B or Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct?

Pixtral 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (58) and Command R (51). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Command R, Pixtral 12B or Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct?

Pixtral 12B is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Command R costs $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price); Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct costs $0.197 input / $0.51 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Pixtral 12B versus $0.263 for Command R (1.8× as much) and $0.275 for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (1.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Command R has not been scored yet, Pixtral 12B has not been scored yet and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command R, Pixtral 12B and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Command R, Pixtral 12B and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Command R up to 4,000, Pixtral 12B up to 128,000, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Command R accepts text; Pixtral 12B accepts text and images; Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct accepts text and images. Pixtral 12B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct is the newest, released Sep 25, 2024. Pixtral 12B came out Sep 1, 2024; Command R came out Aug 30, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Command R Jun 1, 2024, Pixtral 12B Sep 2024, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct Dec 2023.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.