Command R vs Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct comes out ahead, 58 to 51 and 33 on our weighted score.
CohereCommand R
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context128K
- Cohere
Aya Expanse 32B
33/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
- Our pick
MetaLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.197 / $0.51
- Context128K
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct is our pick
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Command R (51) and Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCommand RCommand R $0.263 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct $0.275 · Aya Expanse 32B $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameCommand R 128,000 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructCommand R: Text · Aya Expanse 32B: Text · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Command R | Aya Expanse 32B | Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 77 | 56 | 76 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 0 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 33/100 | 58/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Command RCohere | Aya Expanse 32BCohere | Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMeta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.15 (best) | $0.50 | $0.197 |
| Output | $0.60 | $1.50 | $0.51 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.263 (best) | $0.75 | $0.275 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Cohere API | Median of 1 providers | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 4,000 tokens | 4,000 tokens | 4,096 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Open |
| API model ID | command-r-08-2024 | c4ai-aya-expanse-32b | — |
| API providers | 5 (best) | 2 | 2 |
| Released | Aug 30, 2024 | Oct 24, 2024 | Sep 25, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 1, 2024 | — | Dec 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Command R$2.70
- Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
- Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct$2.99
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Command R, Aya Expanse 32B or Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct?
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Command R (51) and Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Command R, Aya Expanse 32B or Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct?
Command R is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct costs $0.197 input / $0.51 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for Command R versus $0.275 for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (1× as much) and $0.75 for Aya Expanse 32B (2.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Command R has not been scored yet, Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command R, Aya Expanse 32B and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command R, Aya Expanse 32B and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Command R up to 4,000, Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Command R accepts text; Aya Expanse 32B accepts text; Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct accepts text and images. Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Aya Expanse 32B is the newest, released Oct 24, 2024. Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct came out Sep 25, 2024; Command R came out Aug 30, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Command R Jun 1, 2024, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct Dec 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
