Command R+ vs Palmyra X4 vs Qwen-VL OCR
Qwen-VL OCR comes out ahead, 36 to 25 and 22 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
CohereCommand R+
22/100- ECI—
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
Writer
Palmyra X4
25/100- ECI—
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-VL OCR
36/100- ECI—
- Price$0.72 / $0.72
- Context34K
Qwen-VL OCR is our pick
Qwen-VL OCR is the better all-round choice, scoring 36/100 against Palmyra X4 (25) and Command R+ (22). It leads on price. Palmyra X4 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen-VL OCRQwen-VL OCR $0.72 · Command R+ $4.38 · Palmyra X4 $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextCommand R+ and Palmyra X4Command R+ 128,000 · Palmyra X4 128,000 · Qwen-VL OCR 34,096 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen-VL OCRCommand R+: Text · Palmyra X4: Text · Qwen-VL OCR: Text, Images
- Self-hostingCommand R+Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Command R+ | Palmyra X4 | Qwen-VL OCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 19 | 19 | 57 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 35 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 1 |
| Overall | 100% | 22/100 | 25/100 | 36/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Command R+Cohere | Palmyra X4Writer | Qwen-VL OCRAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.50 | $2.50 | $0.72 (best) |
| Output | $10.00 | $10.00 | $0.72 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.38 | $4.38 | $0.72 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Cohere API | Median of 1 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens (best) | 34,096 tokens |
| Max output | 4,000 tokens | 4,096 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | command-r-plus-08-2024 | — | qwen-vl-ocr |
| API providers | 7 (best) | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Aug 30, 2024 | Oct 9, 2024 | Oct 28, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 1, 2024 | — | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Command R+$45.00
- Palmyra X4$45.00
- Qwen-VL OCR$8.64
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Command R+, Palmyra X4 or Qwen-VL OCR?
Qwen-VL OCR is the better all-round choice, scoring 36/100 against Palmyra X4 (25) and Command R+ (22). It leads on price. Palmyra X4 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Command R+, Palmyra X4 or Qwen-VL OCR?
Qwen-VL OCR is cheaper at $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Command R+ costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price); Palmyra X4 costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.72 per million tokens for Qwen-VL OCR versus $4.38 for Command R+ (6.1× as much) and $4.38 for Palmyra X4 (6.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Command R+ has not been scored yet, Palmyra X4 has not been scored yet and Qwen-VL OCR has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command R+, Palmyra X4 and Qwen-VL OCR yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen-VL OCR does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command R+ and Palmyra X4 have the largest context windows (128,000 and 128,000 tokens), against 34,096 for Qwen-VL OCR. Maximum output per response: Command R+ up to 4,000, Palmyra X4 up to 4,096, Qwen-VL OCR up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Command R+ accepts text; Palmyra X4 accepts text; Qwen-VL OCR accepts text and images. Qwen-VL OCR handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Command R+ publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Palmyra X4 and Qwen-VL OCR is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen-VL OCR is the newest, released Oct 28, 2024. Palmyra X4 came out Oct 9, 2024; Command R+ came out Aug 30, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Command R+ Jun 1, 2024, Qwen-VL OCR Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
