Command A Vision vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview comes out ahead, 35 to 22 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
CohereCommand A Vision
22/100- ECI—
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview
35/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 35/100 against Command A Vision (22). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview $3.44 · Command A Vision $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameCommand A Vision 128,000 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsCommand A Vision: Text, Images · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview: Text, Images
- Self-hostingCommand A VisionPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Command A Vision | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 19 | 24 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 22/100 | 35/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Command A VisionCohere | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogle |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.50 | $1.25 (best) |
| Output | $10.00 | $10.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.38 | $3.44 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 200K: $2.50 / $15.00 |
| Price source | Official Cohere API | Official Google API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,000 tokens | 64,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | command-a-vision-07-2025 | gemini-2.5-computer-use-preview-10-2025 |
| API providers | 1 | 2 (best) |
| Released | Jul 31, 2025 | Oct 7, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 1, 2024 | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Command A Vision$45.00
- Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview$32.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Command A Vision or Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview?
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 35/100 against Command A Vision (22). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Command A Vision or Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview?
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is cheaper at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Command A Vision costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.44 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview versus $4.38 for Command A Vision (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Command A Vision has not been scored yet and Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command A Vision and Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Command A Vision does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command A Vision and Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Command A Vision up to 8,000, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Command A Vision accepts text and images; Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Command A Vision publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the newest, released Oct 7, 2025. Command A Vision came out Jul 31, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Command A Vision Jun 1, 2024, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GPT-5 ChatThree-way comparison
- Command A Vision vs GPT-5 ChatOpenAI
- Command A Vision vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- Command A Vision vs Pixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI
- Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs GPT-5-CodexOpenAI
- Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Command A TranslateCohere
