ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Command A Translate vs GPT-5.3 Codex vs GPT-5-Codex

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-5-Codex 42, GPT-5.3 Codex 42, Command A Translate 17). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Cohere

    Command A Translate

    Released Aug 28, 2025

    17/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.50 / $10.00
    • Context8K
  2. OpenAI

    GPT-5.3 Codex

    Released Feb 5, 2026

    42/100
    • ECI156.8
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context400K
  3. OpenAI

    GPT-5-Codex

    Released Sep 15, 2025

    42/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context400K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-5-Codex 42/100, GPT-5.3 Codex 42/100, Command A Translate 17/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5-Codex on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGPT-5-CodexGPT-5-Codex $3.44 · Command A Translate $4.38 · GPT-5.3 Codex $4.81 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.3 Codex and GPT-5-CodexGPT-5.3 Codex 400,000 · GPT-5-Codex 400,000 · Command A Translate 8,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5.3 CodexCommand A Translate: Text · GPT-5.3 Codex: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-5-Codex: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingCommand A TranslatePublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightCommand A TranslateGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5-Codex
Price50%191824
Inputs & features30%258070
Context window20%04444
Overall100%17/10042/10042/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Command A Translate vs GPT-5.3 Codex vs GPT-5-Codex specifications side by side
SpecificationCommand A TranslateCohereGPT-5.3 CodexOpenAIGPT-5-CodexOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—156.8—
ECI rank—#18 of 148—
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues—74.8%—
Price per million tokens
Input$2.50$1.75$1.25 (best)
Output$10.00 (best)$14.00$10.00 (best)
Cached input—$0.175—
Blended (3:1)$4.38$4.81$3.44 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Cohere APIOfficial OpenAI APIMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window8,000 tokens400,000 tokens (best)400,000 tokens (best)
Max output8,000 tokens128,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYeslow · medium · high · xhighYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryProprietary
API model IDcommand-a-translate-08-2025gpt-5.3-codex—
API providers119 (best)3
ReleasedAug 28, 2025Feb 5, 2026Sep 15, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJun 1, 2024Aug 31, 2025Sep 30, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Command A Translate$45.00
  • GPT-5.3 Codex$45.50
  • GPT-5-Codex$32.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Command A Translate, GPT-5.3 Codex or GPT-5-Codex?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-5-Codex 42/100, GPT-5.3 Codex 42/100, Command A Translate 17/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5-Codex on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Command A Translate, GPT-5.3 Codex or GPT-5-Codex?

GPT-5-Codex is cheaper at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Command A Translate costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price); GPT-5.3 Codex costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.44 per million tokens for GPT-5-Codex versus $4.38 for Command A Translate (1.3× as much) and $4.81 for GPT-5.3 Codex (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Command A Translate has not been scored yet, GPT-5.3 Codex has an ECI of 156.8 and GPT-5-Codex has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command A Translate and GPT-5-Codex yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.3 Codex and GPT-5-Codex have the largest context windows (400,000 and 400,000 tokens), against 8,000 for Command A Translate. Maximum output per response: Command A Translate up to 8,000, GPT-5.3 Codex up to 128,000, GPT-5-Codex up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Command A Translate accepts text; GPT-5.3 Codex accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-5-Codex accepts text and images. GPT-5.3 Codex handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Command A Translate publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.3 Codex and GPT-5-Codex is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GPT-5.3 Codex is the newest, released Feb 5, 2026. GPT-5-Codex came out Sep 15, 2025; Command A Translate came out Aug 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Command A Translate Jun 1, 2024, GPT-5.3 Codex Aug 31, 2025, GPT-5-Codex Sep 30, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.