ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Command A Translate vs Command A Reasoning vs GPT-5-Codex

GPT-5-Codex comes out ahead, 42 to 27 and 17 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Cohere

    Command A Translate

    Released Aug 28, 2025

    17/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.50 / $10.00
    • Context8K
  2. Cohere

    Command A Reasoning

    Released Aug 21, 2025

    27/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.50 / $10.00
    • Context256K
  3. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-5-Codex

    Released Sep 15, 2025

    42/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context400K
01 — Verdict

GPT-5-Codex is our pick

GPT-5-Codex is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against Command A Reasoning (27) and Command A Translate (17). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGPT-5-CodexGPT-5-Codex $3.44 · Command A Translate $4.38 · Command A Reasoning $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5-CodexGPT-5-Codex 400,000 · Command A Reasoning 256,000 · Command A Translate 8,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5-CodexCommand A Translate: Text · Command A Reasoning: Text · GPT-5-Codex: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingCommand A Translate and Command A ReasoningPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightCommand A TranslateCommand A ReasoningGPT-5-Codex
Price50%191924
Inputs & features30%253570
Context window20%03644
Overall100%17/10027/10042/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Command A Translate vs Command A Reasoning vs GPT-5-Codex specifications side by side
SpecificationCommand A TranslateCohereCommand A ReasoningCohereGPT-5-CodexOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$2.50$2.50$1.25 (best)
Output$10.00$10.00$10.00
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$4.38$4.38$3.44 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Cohere APIOfficial Cohere APIMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window8,000 tokens256,000 tokens400,000 tokens (best)
Max output8,000 tokens32,000 tokens128,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model IDcommand-a-translate-08-2025command-a-reasoning-08-2025—
API providers13 (best)3 (best)
ReleasedAug 28, 2025Aug 21, 2025Sep 15, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJun 1, 2024Jun 1, 2024Sep 30, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Command A Translate$45.00
  • Command A Reasoning$45.00
  • GPT-5-Codex$32.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Command A Translate, Command A Reasoning or GPT-5-Codex?

GPT-5-Codex is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against Command A Reasoning (27) and Command A Translate (17). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Command A Translate, Command A Reasoning or GPT-5-Codex?

GPT-5-Codex is cheaper at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Command A Translate costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price); Command A Reasoning costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.44 per million tokens for GPT-5-Codex versus $4.38 for Command A Translate (1.3× as much) and $4.38 for Command A Reasoning (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Command A Translate has not been scored yet, Command A Reasoning has not been scored yet and GPT-5-Codex has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command A Translate, Command A Reasoning and GPT-5-Codex yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5-Codex has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 256,000 for Command A Reasoning and 8,000 for Command A Translate. Maximum output per response: Command A Translate up to 8,000, Command A Reasoning up to 32,000, GPT-5-Codex up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Command A Translate accepts text; Command A Reasoning accepts text; GPT-5-Codex accepts text and images. GPT-5-Codex handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Command A Translate and Command A Reasoning publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5-Codex is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GPT-5-Codex is the newest, released Sep 15, 2025. Command A Translate came out Aug 28, 2025; Command A Reasoning came out Aug 21, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Command A Translate Jun 1, 2024, Command A Reasoning Jun 1, 2024, GPT-5-Codex Sep 30, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.