ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Command A Reasoning vs Jamba Large vs GPT-5 Chat

GPT-5 Chat comes out ahead, 34 to 30 and 27 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Cohere

    Command A Reasoning

    Released Aug 21, 2025

    27/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.50 / $10.00
    • Context256K
  2. AI21 Labs

    Jamba Large

    Released Jul 1, 2025

    30/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $8.00
    • Context256K
  3. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-5 Chat

    Released Aug 7, 2025

    34/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context400K
01 — Verdict

GPT-5 Chat is our pick

GPT-5 Chat is the better all-round choice, scoring 34/100 against Jamba Large (30) and Command A Reasoning (27). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGPT-5 ChatGPT-5 Chat $3.44 · Jamba Large $3.50 · Command A Reasoning $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5 ChatGPT-5 Chat 400,000 · Command A Reasoning 256,000 · Jamba Large 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5 ChatCommand A Reasoning: Text · Jamba Large: Text · GPT-5 Chat: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingCommand A Reasoning and Jamba LargePublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightCommand A ReasoningJamba LargeGPT-5 Chat
Price50%192424
Inputs & features30%353545
Context window20%363644
Overall100%27/10030/10034/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Command A Reasoning vs Jamba Large vs GPT-5 Chat specifications side by side
SpecificationCommand A ReasoningCohereJamba LargeAI21 LabsGPT-5 ChatOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$2.50$2.00$1.25 (best)
Output$10.00$8.00 (best)$10.00
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$4.38$3.50$3.44 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Cohere APIOfficial AI21 Labs APIMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens256,000 tokens400,000 tokens (best)
Max output32,000 tokens4,096 tokens128,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoYes
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model IDcommand-a-reasoning-08-2025jamba-large—
API providers3 (best)12
ReleasedAug 21, 2025Jul 1, 2025Aug 7, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJun 1, 2024Aug 22, 2024Sep 30, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Command A Reasoning$45.00
  • Jamba Large$36.00
  • GPT-5 Chat$32.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Command A Reasoning, Jamba Large or GPT-5 Chat?

GPT-5 Chat is the better all-round choice, scoring 34/100 against Jamba Large (30) and Command A Reasoning (27). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Command A Reasoning, Jamba Large or GPT-5 Chat?

GPT-5 Chat is cheaper at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Jamba Large costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price); Command A Reasoning costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.44 per million tokens for GPT-5 Chat versus $3.50 for Jamba Large (1× as much) and $4.38 for Command A Reasoning (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Command A Reasoning has not been scored yet, Jamba Large has not been scored yet and GPT-5 Chat has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command A Reasoning, Jamba Large and GPT-5 Chat yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that GPT-5 Chat does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5 Chat has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 256,000 for Command A Reasoning and 256,000 for Jamba Large. Maximum output per response: Command A Reasoning up to 32,000, Jamba Large up to 4,096, GPT-5 Chat up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Command A Reasoning accepts text; Jamba Large accepts text; GPT-5 Chat accepts text and images. GPT-5 Chat handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Command A Reasoning and Jamba Large publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5 Chat is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Command A Reasoning is the newest, released Aug 21, 2025. GPT-5 Chat came out Aug 7, 2025; Jamba Large came out Jul 1, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Command A Reasoning Jun 1, 2024, Jamba Large Aug 22, 2024, GPT-5 Chat Sep 30, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.