Command A Plus vs MAI-Code-1-Flash
Command A Plus comes out ahead, 52 to 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
CohereCommand A Plus
52/100- ECI—
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
MicrosoftMAI-Code-1-Flash
41/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Command A Plus is our pick
Command A Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against MAI-Code-1-Flash (41). It leads on inputs & features. MAI-Code-1-Flash wins on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCommand A PlusCommand A Plus $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · MAI-Code-1-Flash unpriced
- Longest contextMAI-Code-1-FlashMAI-Code-1-Flash 256,000 · Command A Plus 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsCommand A PlusCommand A Plus: Text, Images · MAI-Code-1-Flash: Text
- Self-hostingCommand A PlusPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Command A Plus | MAI-Code-1-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 70 | 45 |
| Context window | 40% | 24 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 52/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Command A PlusCohere | MAI-Code-1-FlashMicrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.50 | — |
| Output | $10.00 | — |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.38 | — |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | — |
| Price source | Official Cohere API | — |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | command-a-plus-05-2026 | — |
| API providers | 1 | — |
| Released | May 20, 2026 | Jun 2, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 1, 2025 | Dec 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Command A Plus$45.00
- MAI-Code-1-Flash—
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Command A Plus or MAI-Code-1-Flash?
Command A Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against MAI-Code-1-Flash (41). It leads on inputs & features. MAI-Code-1-Flash wins on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Command A Plus or MAI-Code-1-Flash?
Command A Plus is cheaper at $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.38 per million tokens for Command A Plus versus . MAI-Code-1-Flash has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Command A Plus has not been scored yet and MAI-Code-1-Flash has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command A Plus and MAI-Code-1-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MAI-Code-1-Flash has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Command A Plus. Maximum output per response: Command A Plus up to 64,000, MAI-Code-1-Flash up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Command A Plus accepts text and images; MAI-Code-1-Flash accepts text. Command A Plus handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Command A Plus publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; MAI-Code-1-Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MAI-Code-1-Flash is the newest, released Jun 2, 2026. Command A Plus came out May 20, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Command A Plus Apr 1, 2025, MAI-Code-1-Flash Dec 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedThree-way comparison
- Command A Plus vs Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI
- Command A Plus vs GPT-5.3 Codex SparkOpenAI
- Command A Plus vs ParetoUnbiased
- Command A Plus vs Qwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen)
- MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Nex-N2-ProNex AGI
- MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
