ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Command A Plus vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Qwen3.8 Max Preview comes out ahead, 47 to 44 and 35 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Cohere

    Command A Plus

    Released May 20, 2026

    35/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.50 / $10.00
    • Context128K
  2. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed

    Released Jun 12, 2026

    44/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.90 / $8.00
    • Context262K
  3. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Max Preview

    Released Jul 19, 2026

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is our pick

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (44) and Command A Plus (35). It leads on price and context window. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.8 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview $3.00 · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed $3.42 · Command A Plus $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3.8 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview 1,000,000 · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 262,144 · Command A Plus 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed and Qwen3.8 Max PreviewCommand A Plus: Text, Images · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingCommand A Plus and Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightCommand A PlusKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedQwen3.8 Max Preview
Price50%192527
Inputs & features30%708070
Context window20%243760
Overall100%35/10044/10047/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Command A Plus vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationCommand A PlusCohereKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AIQwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$2.50$1.90 (best)$2.00
Output$10.00$8.00$6.00 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$4.38$3.42$3.00 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Cohere APIMedian of 11 providersMedian of 6 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output64,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model IDcommand-a-plus-05-2026——
API providers111 (best)6
ReleasedMay 20, 2026Jun 12, 2026Jul 19, 2026
Knowledge cutoffApr 1, 2025Jan 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Command A Plus$45.00
  • Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed$35.00
  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Command A Plus, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (44) and Command A Plus (35). It leads on price and context window. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Command A Plus, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers). Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed costs $1.90 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers); Command A Plus costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Qwen3.8 Max Preview versus $3.42 for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (1.1× as much) and $4.38 for Command A Plus (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Command A Plus has not been scored yet, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed has not been scored yet and Qwen3.8 Max Preview has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command A Plus, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed and Qwen3.8 Max Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed and 128,000 for Command A Plus. Maximum output per response: Command A Plus up to 64,000, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed up to 262,144, Qwen3.8 Max Preview up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Command A Plus accepts text and images; Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed accepts text, images and video; Qwen3.8 Max Preview accepts text, images and video. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Command A Plus and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.8 Max Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is the newest, released Jul 19, 2026. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed came out Jun 12, 2026; Command A Plus came out May 20, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Command A Plus Apr 1, 2025, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.