ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Aya Vision 32B vs Magistral Medium vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Too close to call on our weighted score (Magistral Medium 31, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 30, Aya Vision 32B 15). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Cohere

    Aya Vision 32B

    Released Mar 4, 2025

    15/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context16K
  2. Mistral AI

    Magistral Medium

    Released Mar 17, 2025

    31/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $5.00
    • Context128K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

    Released Apr 2025

    30/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.50 / $7.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Magistral Medium 31/100, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 30/100, Aya Vision 32B 15/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Magistral Medium on price and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMagistral MediumMagistral Medium $2.75 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Aya Vision 32B unpriced
  • Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Magistral Medium 128,000 · Aya Vision 32B 16,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsAya Vision 32BAya Vision 32B: Text, Images · Magistral Medium: Text · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingAya Vision 32B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightAya Vision 32BMagistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Inputs & features60%253525
Context window40%02437
Overall100%15/10031/10030/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Aya Vision 32B vs Magistral Medium vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationAya Vision 32BCohereMagistral MediumMistral AIQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input—$2.00$1.50 (best)
Output—$5.00 (best)$7.50
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)—$2.75 (best)$3.00
Long-context rate—Same rateOver 32K: $2.70 / $13.50
Price source—Official Mistral APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window16,000 tokens128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output4,000 tokens16,384 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenCC-BY-NC-4.0ProprietaryOpen
API model IDc4ai-aya-vision-32bmagistral-medium-latestqwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
API providers147 (best)
ReleasedMar 4, 2025Mar 17, 2025Apr 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Jun 2025Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Aya Vision 32B—
  • Magistral Medium$30.00
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Aya Vision 32B, Magistral Medium or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Magistral Medium 31/100, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 30/100, Aya Vision 32B 15/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Magistral Medium on price and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Aya Vision 32B, Magistral Medium or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.75 per million tokens for Magistral Medium versus $3.00 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (1.1× as much). Aya Vision 32B has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Aya Vision 32B has not been scored yet, Magistral Medium has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Vision 32B, Magistral Medium and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Vision 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Magistral Medium and 16,000 for Aya Vision 32B. Maximum output per response: Aya Vision 32B up to 4,000, Magistral Medium up to 16,384, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Aya Vision 32B accepts text and images; Magistral Medium accepts text; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text. Aya Vision 32B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Aya Vision 32B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Magistral Medium is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 2025. Magistral Medium came out Mar 17, 2025; Aya Vision 32B came out Mar 4, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Magistral Medium Jun 2025, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.