Aya Vision 32B vs Magistral Medium vs Qwen-MT Plus
Magistral Medium comes out ahead, 31 to 15 and 0 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
CohereAya Vision 32B
15/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context16K
- Our pick
Mistral AIMagistral Medium
31/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $5.00
- Context128K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-MT Plus
0/100- ECI—
- Price$2.46 / $7.37
- Context16K
Magistral Medium is our pick
Magistral Medium is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Aya Vision 32B (15) and Qwen-MT Plus (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMagistral MediumMagistral Medium $2.75 · Qwen-MT Plus $3.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Aya Vision 32B unpriced
- Longest contextMagistral MediumMagistral Medium 128,000 · Qwen-MT Plus 16,384 · Aya Vision 32B 16,000 tokens
- Widest inputsAya Vision 32BAya Vision 32B: Text, Images · Magistral Medium: Text · Qwen-MT Plus: Text
- Self-hostingAya Vision 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Aya Vision 32B | Magistral Medium | Qwen-MT Plus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 25 | 35 | 0 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 15/100 | 31/100 | 0/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Aya Vision 32BCohere | Magistral MediumMistral AI | Qwen-MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | $2.00 (best) | $2.46 |
| Output | — | $5.00 (best) | $7.37 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $2.75 (best) | $3.69 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Mistral API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 16,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens |
| Max output | 4,000 tokens | 16,384 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | c4ai-aya-vision-32b | magistral-medium-latest | qwen-mt-plus |
| API providers | 1 | 4 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Mar 4, 2025 | Mar 17, 2025 | Jan 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jun 2025 | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Aya Vision 32B—
- Magistral Medium$30.00
- Qwen-MT Plus$39.34
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Aya Vision 32B, Magistral Medium or Qwen-MT Plus?
Magistral Medium is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Aya Vision 32B (15) and Qwen-MT Plus (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Aya Vision 32B, Magistral Medium or Qwen-MT Plus?
Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen-MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.75 per million tokens for Magistral Medium versus $3.69 for Qwen-MT Plus (1.3× as much). Aya Vision 32B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Aya Vision 32B has not been scored yet, Magistral Medium has not been scored yet and Qwen-MT Plus has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Vision 32B, Magistral Medium and Qwen-MT Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Vision 32B and Qwen-MT Plus does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Magistral Medium has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 16,384 for Qwen-MT Plus and 16,000 for Aya Vision 32B. Maximum output per response: Aya Vision 32B up to 4,000, Magistral Medium up to 16,384, Qwen-MT Plus up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Aya Vision 32B accepts text and images; Magistral Medium accepts text; Qwen-MT Plus accepts text. Aya Vision 32B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Aya Vision 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Magistral Medium and Qwen-MT Plus is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Magistral Medium is the newest, released Mar 17, 2025. Aya Vision 32B came out Mar 4, 2025; Qwen-MT Plus came out Jan 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Magistral Medium Jun 2025, Qwen-MT Plus Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
