Aya Vision 32B vs Magistral Medium vs o1-pro
o1-pro comes out ahead, 55 to 31 and 15 on our weighted score, though Magistral Medium is 95× cheaper per token.
CohereAya Vision 32B
15/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context16K
Mistral AIMagistral Medium
31/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $5.00
- Context128K
- Our pick
OpenAIo1-pro
55/100- ECI—
- Price$150.00 / $600.00
- Context200K
o1-pro is our pick
o1-pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Magistral Medium (31) and Aya Vision 32B (15). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMagistral MediumMagistral Medium $2.75 · o1-pro $262.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Aya Vision 32B unpriced
- Longest contexto1-proo1-pro 200,000 · Magistral Medium 128,000 · Aya Vision 32B 16,000 tokens
- Widest inputsAya Vision 32B and o1-proAya Vision 32B: Text, Images · Magistral Medium: Text · o1-pro: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAya Vision 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Aya Vision 32B | Magistral Medium | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 25 | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 24 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 15/100 | 31/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Aya Vision 32BCohere | Magistral MediumMistral AI | o1-proOpenAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | $2.00 (best) | $150.00 |
| Output | — | $5.00 (best) | $600.00 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $2.75 (best) | $262.50 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Mistral API | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 16,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,000 tokens | 16,384 tokens | 100,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | c4ai-aya-vision-32b | magistral-medium-latest | o1-pro |
| API providers | 1 | 4 | 5 (best) |
| Released | Mar 4, 2025 | Mar 17, 2025 | Mar 19, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jun 2025 | Sep 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Aya Vision 32B—
- Magistral Medium$30.00
- o1-pro$2,700
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Aya Vision 32B, Magistral Medium or o1-pro?
o1-pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Magistral Medium (31) and Aya Vision 32B (15). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Aya Vision 32B, Magistral Medium or o1-pro?
Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). o1-pro costs $150.00 input / $600.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.75 per million tokens for Magistral Medium versus $262.50 for o1-pro (95× as much). Aya Vision 32B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Aya Vision 32B has not been scored yet, Magistral Medium has not been scored yet and o1-pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Vision 32B, Magistral Medium and o1-pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Vision 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
o1-pro has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Magistral Medium and 16,000 for Aya Vision 32B. Maximum output per response: Aya Vision 32B up to 4,000, Magistral Medium up to 16,384, o1-pro up to 100,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Aya Vision 32B accepts text and images; Magistral Medium accepts text; o1-pro accepts text and images. Aya Vision 32B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Aya Vision 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Magistral Medium and o1-pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
o1-pro is the newest, released Mar 19, 2025. Magistral Medium came out Mar 17, 2025; Aya Vision 32B came out Mar 4, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Magistral Medium Jun 2025, o1-pro Sep 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
