Aya Vision 32B vs GPT-5.1 Chat vs Magistral Medium
GPT-5.1 Chat comes out ahead, 52 to 31 and 15 on our weighted score, though Magistral Medium is 20% cheaper per token.
CohereAya Vision 32B
15/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context16K
- Our pick
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Chat
52/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context128K
Mistral AIMagistral Medium
31/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $5.00
- Context128K
GPT-5.1 Chat is our pick
GPT-5.1 Chat is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Magistral Medium (31) and Aya Vision 32B (15). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMagistral MediumMagistral Medium $2.75 · GPT-5.1 Chat $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Aya Vision 32B unpriced
- Longest contextGPT-5.1 Chat and Magistral MediumGPT-5.1 Chat 128,000 · Magistral Medium 128,000 · Aya Vision 32B 16,000 tokens
- Widest inputsAya Vision 32B and GPT-5.1 ChatAya Vision 32B: Text, Images · GPT-5.1 Chat: Text, Images · Magistral Medium: Text
- Self-hostingAya Vision 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Aya Vision 32B | GPT-5.1 Chat | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 25 | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 15/100 | 52/100 | 31/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Aya Vision 32BCohere | GPT-5.1 ChatOpenAI | Magistral MediumMistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | $1.25 (best) | $2.00 |
| Output | — | $10.00 | $5.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $3.44 | $2.75 (best) |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Median of 2 providers | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 16,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,000 tokens | 16,384 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | c4ai-aya-vision-32b | — | magistral-medium-latest |
| API providers | 1 | 2 | 4 (best) |
| Released | Mar 4, 2025 | Nov 13, 2025 | Mar 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Sep 30, 2024 | Jun 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Aya Vision 32B—
- GPT-5.1 Chat$32.50
- Magistral Medium$30.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Aya Vision 32B, GPT-5.1 Chat or Magistral Medium?
GPT-5.1 Chat is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Magistral Medium (31) and Aya Vision 32B (15). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Aya Vision 32B, GPT-5.1 Chat or Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). GPT-5.1 Chat costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.75 per million tokens for Magistral Medium versus $3.44 for GPT-5.1 Chat (1.3× as much). Aya Vision 32B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Aya Vision 32B has not been scored yet, GPT-5.1 Chat has not been scored yet and Magistral Medium has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Vision 32B, GPT-5.1 Chat and Magistral Medium yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Vision 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.1 Chat and Magistral Medium have the largest context windows (128,000 and 128,000 tokens), against 16,000 for Aya Vision 32B. Maximum output per response: Aya Vision 32B up to 4,000, GPT-5.1 Chat up to 16,384, Magistral Medium up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Aya Vision 32B accepts text and images; GPT-5.1 Chat accepts text and images; Magistral Medium accepts text. Aya Vision 32B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Aya Vision 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.1 Chat and Magistral Medium is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GPT-5.1 Chat is the newest, released Nov 13, 2025. Magistral Medium came out Mar 17, 2025; Aya Vision 32B came out Mar 4, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.1 Chat Sep 30, 2024, Magistral Medium Jun 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
