Aya Expanse 8B vs GLM-4.5-Flash vs Qwen-VL OCR
GLM-4.5-Flash comes out ahead, 31 to 15 and 0 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
CohereAya Expanse 8B
0/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context8K
- Our pick
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5-Flash
31/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context131K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-VL OCR
15/100- ECI—
- Price$0.72 / $0.72
- Context34K
GLM-4.5-Flash is our pick
GLM-4.5-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Qwen-VL OCR (15) and Aya Expanse 8B (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGLM-4.5-FlashGLM-4.5-Flash Free · Qwen-VL OCR $0.72 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Aya Expanse 8B unpriced
- Longest contextGLM-4.5-FlashGLM-4.5-Flash 131,072 · Qwen-VL OCR 34,096 · Aya Expanse 8B 8,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen-VL OCRAya Expanse 8B: Text · GLM-4.5-Flash: Text · Qwen-VL OCR: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAya Expanse 8BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Aya Expanse 8B | GLM-4.5-Flash | Qwen-VL OCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 0 | 35 | 25 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 24 | 1 |
| Overall | 100% | 0/100 | 31/100 | 15/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Aya Expanse 8BCohere | GLM-4.5-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu) | Qwen-VL OCRAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | Free (best) | $0.72 |
| Output | — | Free (best) | $0.72 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | Free (best) | $0.72 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Z.AI API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 8,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 34,096 tokens |
| Max output | 4,000 tokens | 98,304 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | glm-4.5-flash | qwen-vl-ocr |
| API providers | — | 4 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Oct 24, 2024 | Jul 28, 2025 | Oct 28, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Apr 2025 | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Aya Expanse 8B—
- GLM-4.5-FlashFree
- Qwen-VL OCR$8.64
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Aya Expanse 8B, GLM-4.5-Flash or Qwen-VL OCR?
GLM-4.5-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Qwen-VL OCR (15) and Aya Expanse 8B (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Aya Expanse 8B, GLM-4.5-Flash or Qwen-VL OCR?
GLM-4.5-Flash is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Qwen-VL OCR costs $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GLM-4.5-Flash is listed as free. Aya Expanse 8B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Aya Expanse 8B has not been scored yet, GLM-4.5-Flash has not been scored yet and Qwen-VL OCR has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Expanse 8B, GLM-4.5-Flash and Qwen-VL OCR yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 8B and Qwen-VL OCR does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
GLM-4.5-Flash has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 34,096 for Qwen-VL OCR and 8,000 for Aya Expanse 8B. Maximum output per response: Aya Expanse 8B up to 4,000, GLM-4.5-Flash up to 98,304, Qwen-VL OCR up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Aya Expanse 8B accepts text; GLM-4.5-Flash accepts text; Qwen-VL OCR accepts text and images. Qwen-VL OCR handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Aya Expanse 8B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; GLM-4.5-Flash and Qwen-VL OCR is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GLM-4.5-Flash is the newest, released Jul 28, 2025. Qwen-VL OCR came out Oct 28, 2024; Aya Expanse 8B came out Oct 24, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.5-Flash Apr 2025, Qwen-VL OCR Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
