ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Aya Expanse 32B vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct vs Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct comes out ahead, 51 to 45 and 33 on our weighted score, though Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct is 10% cheaper per token.

  1. Cohere

    Aya Expanse 32B

    Released Oct 24, 2024

    33/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context128K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct

    Released Nov 12, 2024

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.43 / $0.60
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct

    Released Sep 2024

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.35 / $1.05
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct is our pick

Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct (45) and Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructQwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct $0.473 · Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct $0.525 · Aya Expanse 32B $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 7B InstructQwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 131,072 · Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct 131,072 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen2.5-VL 7B InstructAya Expanse 32B: Text · Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct: Text · Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightAya Expanse 32BQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructQwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct
Price50%566563
Inputs & features30%02550
Context window20%242424
Overall100%33/10045/10051/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Aya Expanse 32B vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct vs Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationAya Expanse 32BCohereQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen2.5-VL 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50$0.43$0.35 (best)
Output$1.50$0.60 (best)$1.05
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.75$0.473 (best)$0.525
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 4 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)
Max output4,000 tokens8,192 tokens (best)8,192 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenCC-BY-NC-4.0OpenOpen
API model IDc4ai-aya-expanse-32b—qwen2-5-vl-7b-instruct
API providers24 (best)1
ReleasedOct 24, 2024Nov 12, 2024Sep 2024
Knowledge cutoff——Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
  • Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct$5.50
  • Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct$5.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Aya Expanse 32B, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct or Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct (45) and Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Aya Expanse 32B, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct or Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct is cheaper at $0.43 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct costs $0.35 input / $1.05 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.473 per million tokens for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct versus $0.525 for Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct (1.1× as much) and $0.75 for Aya Expanse 32B (1.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct has not been scored yet and Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Expanse 32B, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 128,000 for Aya Expanse 32B. Maximum output per response: Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct up to 8,192, Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Aya Expanse 32B accepts text; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct accepts text; Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct accepts text and images. Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct is the newest, released Nov 12, 2024. Aya Expanse 32B came out Oct 24, 2024; Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct came out Sep 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.