Aya Expanse 32B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B
Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B comes out ahead, 59 to 42 and 33 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
CohereAya Expanse 32B
33/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
42/100- ECI—
- Price$0.35 / $1.40
- Context131K
- Our pickAlibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B
59/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.80
- Context131K
Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is our pick
Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Qwen2.5 14B Instruct (42) and Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3-VL 30B-A3BQwen3-VL 30B-A3B $0.35 · Qwen2.5 14B Instruct $0.613 · Aya Expanse 32B $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3-VL 30B-A3BQwen2.5 14B Instruct 131,072 · Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B 131,072 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3-VL 30B-A3BAya Expanse 32B: Text · Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: Text · Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Aya Expanse 32B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 56 | 60 | 72 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 25 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 33/100 | 42/100 | 59/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Aya Expanse 32BCohere | Qwen2.5 14B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3-VL 30B-A3BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.50 | $0.35 | $0.20 (best) |
| Output | $1.50 | $1.40 | $0.80 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.75 | $0.613 | $0.35 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Alibaba API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Open | Open |
| API model ID | c4ai-aya-expanse-32b | qwen2-5-14b-instruct | qwen3-vl-30b-a3b |
| API providers | 2 (best) | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Oct 24, 2024 | Sep 2024 | Apr 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Apr 2024 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct$6.30
- Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B$3.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Aya Expanse 32B, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B?
Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Qwen2.5 14B Instruct (42) and Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Aya Expanse 32B, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B?
Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is cheaper at $0.20 input / $0.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Qwen2.5 14B Instruct costs $0.35 input / $1.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.35 per million tokens for Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B versus $0.613 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct (1.8× as much) and $0.75 for Aya Expanse 32B (2.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has not been scored yet and Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Expanse 32B, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 128,000 for Aya Expanse 32B. Maximum output per response: Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct up to 8,192, Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Aya Expanse 32B accepts text; Qwen2.5 14B Instruct accepts text; Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B accepts text and images. Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is the newest, released Apr 2025. Aya Expanse 32B came out Oct 24, 2024; Qwen2.5 14B Instruct came out Sep 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen2.5 14B Instruct Apr 2024, Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
