Aya Expanse 32B vs Qwen-VL Max
Qwen-VL Max comes out ahead, 41 to 33 on our weighted score, though Aya Expanse 32B is 46% cheaper per token.
CohereAya Expanse 32B
33/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-VL Max
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $3.20
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen-VL Max is our pick
Qwen-VL Max is the better all-round choice, scoring 41/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on inputs & features. Aya Expanse 32B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceAya Expanse 32BAya Expanse 32B $0.75 · Qwen-VL Max $1.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen-VL MaxQwen-VL Max 131,072 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen-VL MaxAya Expanse 32B: Text · Qwen-VL Max: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAya Expanse 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Aya Expanse 32B | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 56 | 43 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 33/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Aya Expanse 32BCohere | Qwen-VL MaxAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.50 (best) | $0.80 |
| Output | $1.50 (best) | $3.20 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.75 (best) | $1.40 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | c4ai-aya-expanse-32b | qwen-vl-max |
| API providers | 2 | 3 (best) |
| Released | Oct 24, 2024 | Apr 8, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
- Qwen-VL Max$14.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Aya Expanse 32B or Qwen-VL Max?
Qwen-VL Max is the better all-round choice, scoring 41/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on inputs & features. Aya Expanse 32B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Aya Expanse 32B or Qwen-VL Max?
Aya Expanse 32B is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Qwen-VL Max costs $0.80 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.75 per million tokens for Aya Expanse 32B versus $1.40 for Qwen-VL Max (1.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet and Qwen-VL Max has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Expanse 32B and Qwen-VL Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen-VL Max has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Aya Expanse 32B. Maximum output per response: Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000, Qwen-VL Max up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Aya Expanse 32B accepts text; Qwen-VL Max accepts text and images. Qwen-VL Max handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Aya Expanse 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen-VL Max is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Aya Expanse 32B is the newest, released Oct 24, 2024. Qwen-VL Max came out Apr 8, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen-VL Max Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
