Aya Expanse 32B vs GLM-4.5-Flash
GLM-4.5-Flash comes out ahead, 65 to 33 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
CohereAya Expanse 32B
33/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
- Our pick
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5-Flash
65/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
GLM-4.5-Flash is our pick
GLM-4.5-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGLM-4.5-FlashGLM-4.5-Flash Free · Aya Expanse 32B $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGLM-4.5-FlashGLM-4.5-Flash 131,072 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsAya Expanse 32B: Text · GLM-4.5-Flash: Text
- Self-hostingAya Expanse 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Aya Expanse 32B | GLM-4.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 56 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 33/100 | 65/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Aya Expanse 32BCohere | GLM-4.5-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.50 | Free (best) |
| Output | $1.50 | Free (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.75 | Free (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,000 tokens | 98,304 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | c4ai-aya-expanse-32b | glm-4.5-flash |
| API providers | 2 | 4 (best) |
| Released | Oct 24, 2024 | Jul 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
- GLM-4.5-FlashFree
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Aya Expanse 32B or GLM-4.5-Flash?
GLM-4.5-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (33). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Aya Expanse 32B or GLM-4.5-Flash?
GLM-4.5-Flash is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). GLM-4.5-Flash is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet and GLM-4.5-Flash has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Expanse 32B and GLM-4.5-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
GLM-4.5-Flash has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Aya Expanse 32B. Maximum output per response: Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000, GLM-4.5-Flash up to 98,304 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Aya Expanse 32B accepts text; GLM-4.5-Flash accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Aya Expanse 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; GLM-4.5-Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GLM-4.5-Flash is the newest, released Jul 28, 2025. Aya Expanse 32B came out Oct 24, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.5-Flash Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen-VL OCRThree-way comparison
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Qwen-VL OCRAlibaba (Qwen)
- Aya Expanse 32B vs CodestralMistral AI
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNVIDIA
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMeta
- GLM-4.5-Flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BNVIDIA
- GLM-4.5-Flash vs Nova 2 ProAmazon
