ALLaM-2-7b vs Step 1 (32K)
Step 1 (32K) comes out ahead, 15 to 0 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
SDAIA
ALLaM-2-7b
0/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context4K
- Our pick
StepFunStep 1 (32K)
15/100- ECI—
- Price$2.05 / $9.59
- Context33K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Step 1 (32K) is our pick
Step 1 (32K) is the better all-round choice, scoring 15/100 against ALLaM-2-7b (0). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceStep 1 (32K)Step 1 (32K) $3.94 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · ALLaM-2-7b unpriced
- Longest contextStep 1 (32K)Step 1 (32K) 32,768 · ALLaM-2-7b 4,096 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsALLaM-2-7b: Text · Step 1 (32K): Text
- Self-hostingALLaM-2-7bPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | ALLaM-2-7b | Step 1 (32K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 0 | 25 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 0/100 | 15/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ALLaM-2-7bSDAIA | Step 1 (32K)StepFun |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $2.05 |
| Output | — | $9.59 |
| Cached input | — | $0.41 |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $3.94 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official StepFun (Global) API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 4,096 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | step-1-32k |
| API providers | 2 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Jan 23, 2025 | Jan 1, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jun 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- ALLaM-2-7b—
- Step 1 (32K)$39.68
Which should you choose?
Which is better: ALLaM-2-7b or Step 1 (32K)?
Step 1 (32K) is the better all-round choice, scoring 15/100 against ALLaM-2-7b (0). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, ALLaM-2-7b or Step 1 (32K)?
Step 1 (32K) is cheaper at $2.05 input / $9.59 output per million tokens (official StepFun (Global) API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.94 per million tokens for Step 1 (32K) versus . ALLaM-2-7b has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. ALLaM-2-7b has not been scored yet and Step 1 (32K) has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for ALLaM-2-7b and Step 1 (32K) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that ALLaM-2-7b does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Step 1 (32K) has the largest context window at 32,768 tokens, against 4,096 for ALLaM-2-7b. Maximum output per response: ALLaM-2-7b up to 4,096, Step 1 (32K) up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
ALLaM-2-7b accepts text; Step 1 (32K) accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
ALLaM-2-7b publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Step 1 (32K) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
ALLaM-2-7b is the newest, released Jan 23, 2025. Step 1 (32K) came out Jan 1, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Step 1 (32K) Jun 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
