ALLaM-2-7b vs Aya Vision 32B vs o1-pro
o1-pro comes out ahead, 55 to 15 and 0 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
SDAIA
ALLaM-2-7b
0/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context4K
CohereAya Vision 32B
15/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context16K
- Our pick
OpenAIo1-pro
55/100- ECI—
- Price$150.00 / $600.00
- Context200K
o1-pro is our pick
o1-pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Aya Vision 32B (15) and ALLaM-2-7b (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceo1-proo1-pro $262.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · ALLaM-2-7b and Aya Vision 32B unpriced
- Longest contexto1-proo1-pro 200,000 · Aya Vision 32B 16,000 · ALLaM-2-7b 4,096 tokens
- Widest inputsAya Vision 32B and o1-proALLaM-2-7b: Text · Aya Vision 32B: Text, Images · o1-pro: Text, Images
- Self-hostingALLaM-2-7b and Aya Vision 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | ALLaM-2-7b | Aya Vision 32B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 0 | 25 | 70 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 0 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 0/100 | 15/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ALLaM-2-7bSDAIA | Aya Vision 32BCohere | o1-proOpenAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | — | $150.00 |
| Output | — | — | $600.00 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | — | $262.50 |
| Long-context rate | — | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | — | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 4,096 tokens | 16,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 4,000 tokens | 100,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | No | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | c4ai-aya-vision-32b | o1-pro |
| API providers | 2 | 1 | 5 (best) |
| Released | Jan 23, 2025 | Mar 4, 2025 | Mar 19, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Sep 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- ALLaM-2-7b—
- Aya Vision 32B—
- o1-pro$2,700
Which should you choose?
Which is better: ALLaM-2-7b, Aya Vision 32B or o1-pro?
o1-pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Aya Vision 32B (15) and ALLaM-2-7b (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, ALLaM-2-7b, Aya Vision 32B or o1-pro?
o1-pro is cheaper at $150.00 input / $600.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $262.50 per million tokens for o1-pro versus . ALLaM-2-7b and Aya Vision 32B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. ALLaM-2-7b has not been scored yet, Aya Vision 32B has not been scored yet and o1-pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for ALLaM-2-7b, Aya Vision 32B and o1-pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that ALLaM-2-7b and Aya Vision 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
o1-pro has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 16,000 for Aya Vision 32B and 4,096 for ALLaM-2-7b. Maximum output per response: ALLaM-2-7b up to 4,096, Aya Vision 32B up to 4,000, o1-pro up to 100,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
ALLaM-2-7b accepts text; Aya Vision 32B accepts text and images; o1-pro accepts text and images. Aya Vision 32B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
ALLaM-2-7b and Aya Vision 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; o1-pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
o1-pro is the newest, released Mar 19, 2025. Aya Vision 32B came out Mar 4, 2025; ALLaM-2-7b came out Jan 23, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: o1-pro Sep 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
